From nobody Wed Feb 28 20:13:35 2024 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TlQXj186Kz5CM2K for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 20:13:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flo@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TlQXj0df6z4WHw; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 20:13:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flo@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1709151221; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=X90mOLsMEV1R/ncwEF6dZcQMoaHjRhpJ0k+cVo0te1c=; b=iR0F6Kbo93K/kqH6dWb/EnAgHYTCjUiVjgD0qQ6VCnjNZbTIK4uOUqrJePQTi+CKe3mvSk ZDDQJOin0jTy7dZCwKI6EzWy16l03MQ/grvCd/98YY1h2Ys/wP+sJInKc4T8ZZOvODQN39 ZzjwiVJECTPCC8b/f/kn5NT3M80JTAk0W0OR2MG4aJqKs31JrDBWiZOC9j8mPw5zNpATdY wJFDXzq3ck2iR4aa9+NkAPLsf4lDeMePTmYZ79YhMMRN7q9RYegDU1lasBlvOIGj7WJx1y E46ICPybsjjZnZoZd8JBPJzOpMbpCTZBj0CTCO7inKzOL9K3IcmitPxRkTIH5Q== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1709151221; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=NCOr8dp2u/3w59S8D+TtPAeAFUuHSrz0+6kGWLHIPmGbGrqn4w4hjeglj9yqpuEKVp2ts+ Fb0BITOXBSNNly1c9aKAcEdhsrJZB/5QMgocy4+QGdap2VeVlbiQ3PhmRACKBV3TnepmgZ JMQzmLco9X447QnMgsEDr4Rnj01OCgYK7pcBe+7zBfkfJYQcWrn3A4ynXhId3c54MANzGv ai+ZzNUzjHDAsbLRgVsoHKX24UxPW4IKmPPaor5xm/ilhJjgaGVbdS5HAsbCE1HfYRJeFj A0kBveOBL/IkC4s2KS5BR80Tecvh8yUQoc3rOycoQ7UleHpHwo/Qb+x0/Ts+yg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1709151221; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=X90mOLsMEV1R/ncwEF6dZcQMoaHjRhpJ0k+cVo0te1c=; b=vbQd8rQuOkXBCE2UzWZey5laLBdlekjKX0oDeY+a0mJ0paP7fducSDtDv5s4rL3CoVa72C TaeStNqftJgz1vE8fs6VMGEpyHN6ThEMb83E9JRJ8JQiB0Loa1yXelXAzsZTdt/ZPF+32A yR7Y/HDXwOnxEkV2LBXb+RVj3wfHtNuoCDoNqpdsXoK/UmxoKfVLhA1bsDekd8ornujxHt sFDh2c4HGutywv24ou6E/0jE6h9T+g4eYUyHqPWSEafU+A0K2aRVJp4P5woo06xVhuuacP /gKcj1SDePt6dLolHQWe4X0U80WpWDdMWLaT4+SAoO9m2sraKBinE0lMk7Waog== Received: from [IPV6:2a01:4f8:10a:fd43::dead] (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f8:10a:fd43::dead]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: flo/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4TlQXh0Ztcz1J1Y; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 20:13:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flo@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <1500d4f4-2bdb-4d3b-8848-900346f4d194@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 21:13:35 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Proposed ports deprecation and removal policy To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, ports@freebsd.org References: <435edf7c-a956-4317-b327-3372de70dbef@FreeBSD.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Florian Smeets In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 28.02.24 21:00, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > On 28/02/2024 20:22, Florian Smeets wrote: > >> Ports can be removed immediately if one of the following conditions is >> met: >> >> - Upstream distfile is no longer available from the original >> source/mirror (Our and other distcaches e.g. Debian, Gentoo, etc do >> not count as "available") > > I miss some sort of time frame like in the following cases. The way the > sentence is written now, it looks like there may be an immediate removal > on the first day of the outage. > Good point. Yeah, it certainly isn't the intention to remove it immediately. I will make a note to add a time frame. I'm thinking 4 weeks, as that feels long for a site to go away and reappear, but we might just make it 3 months as with most of the other points. Thanks Florian