From nobody Fri Feb 23 16:30:08 2024 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ThFq804qcz5B3sH for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 16:30:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@cschubert.com) Received: from omta001.cacentral1.a.cloudfilter.net (omta001.cacentral1.a.cloudfilter.net [3.97.99.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ThFq71rThz4V2l for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 16:30:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@cschubert.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of cy.schubert@cschubert.com has no SPF policy when checking 3.97.99.32) smtp.mailfrom=cy.schubert@cschubert.com Received: from shw-obgw-4002a.ext.cloudfilter.net ([10.228.9.250]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id dUrCrwr6SxDxGdYR8rGWTH; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 16:30:10 +0000 Received: from spqr.komquats.com ([70.66.152.170]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPSA id dYR6rEC3x9Cr4dYR8rjREj; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 16:30:10 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=etl8zZpX c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=65d8c812 a=y8EK/9tc/U6QY+pUhnbtgQ==:117 a=y8EK/9tc/U6QY+pUhnbtgQ==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=k7vzHIieQBIA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=YxBL1-UpAAAA:8 a=EkcXrb_YAAAA:8 a=iOHTs0RU8x81apRhkokA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 a=Ia-lj3WSrqcvXOmTRaiG:22 a=LK5xJRSDVpKd5WXXoEvA:22 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy [10.1.1.91]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E2110A0 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 08:30:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by slippy.cwsent.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AF7DF3F2; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 08:30:08 -0800 (PST) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018 with nmh-1.8+dev Reply-to: Cy Schubert From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.cschubert.com/ To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KSH Alignment In-reply-to: <787339cd-48e4-49bf-b96e-77aab06cedd8@FreeBSD.org> References: <20240223155440.16B282FF@slippy.cwsent.com> <787339cd-48e4-49bf-b96e-77aab06cedd8@FreeBSD.org> Comments: In-reply-to Rodrigo Osorio message dated "Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:16:20 +0100." List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 08:30:08 -0800 Message-Id: <20240223163008.AF7DF3F2@slippy.cwsent.com> X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfMGXprCEBjllvkxK3ui+ve7cjiWUfrvdWH1WMCo51rT/jBQJbud5wwRWnF1MzwWlV6XorggF6nX8+sxmnad4WvTzEAMCWKuLJwhZIzLr5k2p+NrGWdmk VNIEi0FgWYX69N+RnLWxxzUzFd2ijsbMx/SxGkj11RqwkpRYn1JjIMEAWE4WNhU3JLgmShGRUxg/WQuihz2b/f/ZIoxe0T4yfZA= X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.61 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.91)[-0.911]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[3.97.99.32:from]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[cschubert.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:3.96.0.0/15, country:US]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[3.97.99.32:from]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4ThFq71rThz4V2l In message <787339cd-48e4-49bf-b96e-77aab06cedd8@FreeBSD.org>, Rodrigo Osorio w rites: > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > On 23/02/24 16:54, Cy Schubert wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Would there be any interest in either replacing shells/pdksh with > > shells/ksh as our default ksh dependency? Or Uses/ksh.mk to select a > > default ksh for ports? > > > > The reason I ask is, shells/ksh has its lineage from the original AT&T ksh > > (shells/ksh93) and is being actively developed (see shells/ksh-devel). > > shells/ksh upstream is also the ksh imported into and used by CDE > > (x11/cde*). > > > > My position is, I'd prefer a Uses/ksh.mk. If people are interested, I'm > > willing to put this task on my todo list. > > > > > Hi, > As long as there is no compatibilities issues, having a well > maintained ksh version makes a lot of sense. > pdksh wasn't update for ages and afaik, has no active developer. > > As the shells/pdksh maintainer you have my blessing. I'll put together a phabricator review over the next while to add Mk/Uses/ksh.mk. We'll probably need an exp-run too. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org NTP: Web: https://nwtime.org e^(i*pi)+1=0