From nobody Sun Feb 18 11:44:40 2024 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Td3lN67Gvz53xng for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 11:45:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 6yearold@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw1-f173.google.com (mail-yw1-f173.google.com [209.85.128.173]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Td3lM6csTz4T5S for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 11:45:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 6yearold@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by mail-yw1-f173.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-607dec82853so28506607b3.3 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 03:45:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708256751; x=1708861551; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3XjnEbkRKextVM/rLnIlrXDjCGqM1KHy2iUPLFGW6Gg=; b=qe2L8yJSZ08SPFtx6Bp9S+iMVV1g4APc5nXAt3/nviI3SK+5NlclZGcTV/z50QTZHx t85OJLGvIlLRsF++mF2crp/NEt1EEcZd4GijdnfDIlPMr9ChX5hLKllRWW4kBuUgNpLj NzgcyB7fBv9tw0HzrN9hUSDk2w0qQE13ZljHhSqkOnI5JuiIMTMO3Vq2ZP69/x1Zs1o0 stGcE+fxOPjKtZ5YxhWMRxHCLkwUpSU5T7MAfOQqO7K/MKskkwQ+rSUew7fzia2uylcD 2PbdS58UdCnvMFl1k6NqZHBheHuNsZBy13+MJGBAcEIXxpOjlTmWcooPYoa0n+dsjDHG Ovfw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywcy3JvkF/LznTtyBpnB8npHZaWu5P7iOGH3imtO/+Xs7r7wQLk Eq2Pm8IrEZnMMbhvKWlnExSJUogzAwQmUlLyAUMwQUTW/ylftdH1jI4DrCcq9QQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEnr9ZJsRlGwy9eb8iIKvfvMEmuKS6I4RWPvP/PcBdE/t3geNXPCKGHjfpeRA8lq9i8hMjaOQ== X-Received: by 2002:a81:f00b:0:b0:607:9202:3fd9 with SMTP id p11-20020a81f00b000000b0060792023fd9mr8596813ywm.41.1708256750937; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 03:45:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-yb1-f170.google.com (mail-yb1-f170.google.com. [209.85.219.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n62-20020a817241000000b00607cea349f5sm1194307ywc.36.2024.02.18.03.45.50 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 18 Feb 2024 03:45:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yb1-f170.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-dc6d8bd618eso3142675276.3 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 03:45:50 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a25:b347:0:b0:dcc:5a25:ae88 with SMTP id k7-20020a25b347000000b00dcc5a25ae88mr8153336ybg.19.1708256750506; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 03:45:50 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240218015843.34c5d078@rimwks.local> <7q6ep7m2eee6yqtxftlwkhuwdkssd74vjow55txms7lkokazfu@grrqllhefges> <20240218174921.a8082649142dd43a469bebfa@dec.sakura.ne.jp> <4ekno7iwxvdlw4xeholcrxuuazmcstxkqyidrz27ni43lzu6wg@3ro6r5b2vhoi> In-Reply-To: From: Gleb Popov Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 14:44:40 +0300 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Re: FreeBSD ports community is broken To: Aryeh Friedman Cc: FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Td3lM6csTz4T5S X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US] On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 2:35=E2=80=AFPM Aryeh Friedman wrote: > No it is not possible since the pkg's are usually of a different > version then what is built from ports (ports is almost newer) There can't be any other way - ports are building recipes for packages. Packages will always lag behind. > may or may not work if your port expects the latest versions. In > case you have tried it, is it almost impossible to keep a hybrid > pkg/ports machine working your forced to pick one or the other and if > your maintainer then your forced into ports only. If you're using ports only then you still compile everything. I fail to see how this is Poudriere's fault.