Re: FreeBSD ports community is broken
- Reply: Felix Palmen : "Re: Re: FreeBSD ports community is broken"
- In reply to: Felix Palmen : "Re: FreeBSD ports community is broken"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 08:49:21 UTC
On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 07:52:00 +0100 Felix Palmen <zirias@freebsd.org> wrote: > * Rozhuk Ivan <rozhuk.im@gmail.com> [20240218 01:58]: > > 1. devel/pkgconf: unconditionally prioritises base system libraries > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273961 > > Actors: <Charlie Li> vishwin@freebsd.org and <Felix Palmen> zirias@freebsd.org > > Actually, the discussion in this PR (which was ridiculously long because > of one single person) tells the whole story. > > I guess for anyone completely unwilling to even *try* to understand why > their patches NOT fixing the actual root cause are ugly and potentially > harmful hacks, trying to "contribute" to ports while stubbornly spamming > lots of people with needless arguments and in the end even insulting > people is not a great strategy. I mean, there's always the possibility > to fork a project if you want. > > -- > Felix Palmen <zirias@FreeBSD.org> {private} felix@palmen-it.de > -- ports committer -- {web} http://palmen-it.de > {pgp public key} http://palmen-it.de/pub.txt > {pgp fingerprint} 6936 13D5 5BBF 4837 B212 3ACC 54AD E006 9879 F231 I "feel" these are came from the differences on backgrounds of each side. Just a FYI. In automotive industry area, once SINGLE defective part is discovered at customer (GM, Chrysler, Forrd, Toyota, VW,...) side, the supplier must immediately proceed "corrective action". Even some ppm of devective parts shipped to customer is considered as "a huge amount of defects". In many case, corrective action is "additional inspection to stop shipping defective parts". And this is not everything to do. Supplier need to investigate the root cause and decide "preventive action" while "corrective action" is active. For persons working on automotive industry, do nothing until preventive action is made is nonsense. We are forced to do corrective action, even if it's very, very, ... ,very ugly "addidional inspection". Moreover, aerospace area is much more stricter than automotive area. Keeping these in mind, the hack you hate is the "corrective action", while fixing root cause you like is the "preventive action". Corrective action is needed for users until preventive action is done. Note that ugly corrective action can be reverted back once preventive action is confirmed OK and done. -- Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp>