From nobody Fri Feb 16 01:57:55 2024 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TbZp60Z6yz51qkc for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 01:58:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@FreeBSD.org) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TbZp51RH3z41ym for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 01:58:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; spf=softfail (mx1.freebsd.org: 198.144.192.42 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of yuri@FreeBSD.org) smtp.mailfrom=yuri@FreeBSD.org; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=freebsd.org (policy=none) Received: from [192.168.5.3] (c-98-42-44-116.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.42.44.116]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id 41G1vutW024716 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 17:57:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yuri@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-98-42-44-116.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.42.44.116] claimed to be [192.168.5.3] Message-ID: <593106a3-b1c1-4aa6-95b9-e0d15ed2cd47@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 17:57:55 -0800 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: "ports@freebsd.org" From: Yuri Subject: "py-" prefix shouldn't be needed for Python-based ports that are programs, not libraries Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4TbZp51RH3z41ym X-Spamd-Bar: + X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.12 / 15.00]; VIOLATED_DIRECT_SPF(3.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.59)[-0.589]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.10)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[freebsd.org : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[yuri]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7961, ipnet:198.144.192.0/23, country:US]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DOM_EQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[] I think that this section https://wiki.freebsd.org/Python/PortsPolicy#Prefixing_.28py-.2A.29 should be amended: Examples of compelling cases: * The port is a program, and not a library. There is no need to have flavors for Python ports that build only programs and don't build libraries. Thanks, Yuri