security/nss targeting armv7 tries to compile armv8-a source code: nss/lib/freebl/aes-armv8.c
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 07:48:00 UTC
nss/lib/freebl/Makefile has: ifeq ($(CPU_ARCH),arm) $(OBJDIR)/$(PROG_PREFIX)aes-armv8$(OBJ_SUFFIX): CFLAGS += -march=armv8-a -mfpu=crypto-neon-fp-armv8 $(OBJDIR)/$(PROG_PREFIX)gcm-arm32-neon$(OBJ_SUFFIX): CFLAGS += -mfpu=neon endif but targeting -mcpu=cortex-a7 (an armv7) results in the likes of: cc -o FreeBSD15.0_OPT.OBJ/FreeBSD_SINGLE_SHLIB/aes-armv8.o -c -std=c99 -O2 -gline-tables-only -pipe -mcpu=cortex-a7 . . . . -march=armv8-a -mfpu=crypto-neon-fp-armv8 aes-armv8.c cc: warning: ignoring extension 'sha2' because the 'armv7-a' architecture does not support it [-Winvalid-command-line-argument] cc: warning: ignoring extension 'aes' because the 'armv7-a' architecture does not support it [-Winvalid-command-line-argument] aes-armv8.c:14:2: error: "Compiler option is invalid" 14 | #error "Compiler option is invalid" | ^ from nss/lib/freebl/aes-armv8.c: . . . #include "secerr.h" #include "rijndael.h" #if ((defined(__clang__) || \ (defined(__GNUC__) && defined(__GNUC_MINOR__) && \ (__GNUC__ > 4 || (__GNUC__ == 4 && __GNUC_MINOR__ > 8)))) && \ defined(IS_LITTLE_ENDIAN)) #ifndef __ARM_FEATURE_CRYPTO #error "Compiler option is invalid" #endif #include <arm_neon.h> . . . (The example happens to be for 3.103 .) Seems odd to me to have armv7 targeting have any dependency on armv8 encoded instructions that from well after armv7 was defined. (Even if the goal is to have the processor reject the instructions.) Note: I ran into this trying to see if I could build www/firefox in a armv7 jail on a aarch64 that supports armv7 code. BE_WASM for llvm*'s may be a waste of resources if armv7 based builds are just not going to work. (I do not normally build firefox.) === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com