From nobody Mon Aug 26 13:40:46 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WssJN1wTGz5Sx7r; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:40:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R10" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WssJN11s2z4cYy; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:40:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1724679652; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=oIS4pEmLsmn0IkUOtEMsf9/1qAnXNx5wgcUcY0QRUhs=; b=tIjfAUv9cAQC/Dc4uvFXfYsogSRlO7NQrErTgFhFfPoU57Ubc8cmwJyqK4f3oxk4IT6cy1 84v2XOLMqm5GDuLLzMrFnFZZ7x2+6hjeaiDhQbEPkIWijx05DY2dZcOfsDxcO7L2sSyxe6 Yh/72b6l1Lw5aSydKnm8yfBsqnWQLysqOHaaI8da4/OvPHI/Br19bm3BT4fEDLUUdWzLf/ ZUHsy09D6C81VSoOmioIQV5ECPth0HdLmVpeIR8XARuy3gXSvXFObVo8m6eCMLJKS6gNip +fOryImqMp80Bt6UdOEIv6R+W4e3RmrvOG52MoXxuNycdECnxLnYFCDw4QQduA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1724679652; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=v9Ou6Hztd9eAFlzRoLXcWEkT812SHzCIdxCmOC5qY2Z8QdgtVXpxpCU9tlxcsuaqq7SHHY nCEjgCO/FAxBlF52CbK/LdPisIGBtlpMRwyBSf9HMseB94Ww/IxtqTspPJiSwsC7FD2aoY aAMHtix2fNfPQdEjn97tnAYy/xvvzrybeE6TruzdTEeci7iOcTpR8q6PWM5DftilG+wn6q akOfzWfd2TdgqJRtCPQWiDcr/TPfNzLnMQ3AIY0OxENd0MMontRq+hOcZsfW0nZ3yXRrzT TP1uEtDoP62BqpDb0N5DTTXtKhaRLS3BkJuFUhqDZ4PMI6oO0NyY6Bdrjg0IBA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1724679652; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=oIS4pEmLsmn0IkUOtEMsf9/1qAnXNx5wgcUcY0QRUhs=; b=GlD1IqJ/VOpxSNLKhn8YAZI+M+LXKi08luJwJFJJQT+5IquyefgEZFpi4MIRsILNL6tw5Q yf/iNdYm8FbOUj4eGo9m0M0V6fFJr35WomnwIGtt4mjYvq7Xr7t88aBwGjJlyyoFjC1kTl BNuUGFVeuiOG9KtCVQcZSF+vWF23w/+AtNaNuNHUN02LY2nToW23EQXPwBpk/kfLrVhuJZ yTOKLjiItye4LhQGCX/qe6z4uqyfOTqPqgXw9hKpcjqHTWhrNzOO2XRqHCxY8LRSmEP0dp GV4jtDeoJJ7BgHNIDZIYMgJNT9ZEvZcySh8PnjEAxlu9NA1IL4ZMjB9NwgI15A== Received: from fauth1-smtp.messagingengine.com (fauth1-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: philip/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4WssJN0NDBz14jt; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:40:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@freebsd.org) Received: from phl-compute-04.internal (phl-compute-04.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailfauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7AF0120006D; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 09:40:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-04.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 26 Aug 2024 09:40:49 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddruddvkedgieeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnh htshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffvvefufffokfgjfhggtgesthdtmhdtredttden ucfhrhhomheprfhhihhlihhpucfrrggvphhsuceophhhihhlihhpsehfrhgvvggsshgurd horhhgqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefggfefieegtedtledtgfevtdfftdegvdehueei teehteefieefveevtedvvdekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmh epmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehphhhilhhiphdomhgvshhmthhprghuthhhphgvrhhsohhnrghl ihhthidqudduieeivdeivdegkedqvdefhedukedttdekqdhphhhilhhipheppehfrhgvvg gsshgurdhorhhgsehtrhhouhgslhgvrdhishdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepfedpmhhouggv pehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepmhgrrhhklhhmiheshigrhhhoohdrtghomhdprh gtphhtthhopehfrhgvvggsshguqdgrrhhmsehfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhgpdhrtghpthht ohepfhhrvggvsghsugdqphhorhhtshesfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: ia691475d:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 09:40:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Philip Paeps To: Mark Millard Cc: FreeBSD ARM List , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: ampere2 did not even try to build main-armv7-default: it is only trying to build main-arm64-default Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 21:40:46 +0800 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r6059) Message-ID: <0FD5A72E-BFFF-422C-B38F-7EDFB832FAFB@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <90DDBA5B-1D0C-402F-88F5-704DD7D439B9@freebsd.org> References: <90DDBA5B-1D0C-402F-88F5-704DD7D439B9@freebsd.org> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed On 2024-08-25 14:01:09 (+0800), Philip Paeps wrote: > On 2024-08-24 14:34:01 (+0800), Mark Millard wrote: >> On Aug 19, 2024, at 20:17, Mark Millard wrote: >>> main-arm64-default p60a177caf143_s7a8d05ba19b >>> finished its last package build at: Aug 19 17:50:28 UTC 2024, >>> building 34197 of 35762 Queued >>> >>> The next build to start on ampere2 was: >>> >>> main-arm64-default p3efa6621722c_s4132c4be4c0 >>> starting at: 20 Aug 2024 01:13:06 GMT, >>> 18092 Queued. >>> >>> I do not see any evidence of it attempting a >>> main-armv7-default build. >>> >>> So there is still no evidence being gathered for if the >>> hangup fix in the world (jail) code is sufficient to >>> lead to a from-scratch poudriere "bulk -a" running to >>> completion for armv7. >>> >> >> It looks like in the next day or two, p3efa6621722c_s4132c4be4c0 >> of main-arm64-default on ampere2 will finish its "bulk -a" build. >> >> Question: Will main-armv7-default be the next "bulk -a" attempted >> by ampere2 so that there will finally be an updated distribution >> of packages for main-armv7-default (presuming that build >> completes)? > > I've been spread very thin. I'll take a look at what state the > ampereXen are in. I haven't looked at them in several weeks. They're > on my list for the ongoing cluster dogfood refresh, but I've been > working in other areas of the cluster for a couple of weeks. > > Thanks for the nudge. It looks like package building for arm architectures is not in great shape. I've put this higher on my list. I hope to get to it in the morning. Philip