Re: Quarterly backport for multimedia/x265 patch

From: Piotr Smyrak <ps.ports_at_smyrak.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 09:16:23 UTC 
On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 19:13:03 +0200 (CEST)
henrichhartzer@tuta.io wrote:

> Moving forward, it sounds like this is not the first time this has
> happened. Something about the patch format coming back slightly
> differently from Bitbucket. Could we move the patch to the patches/
> folder so this can't be an issue in the future, or could we update to
> x265 3.6, which doesn't need it?

That would require declaring a licence of the patch in the Makefile, as
we imply that patches in the tree are BSD licensed as the ports
collection.

-- 
 Piotr Smyrak