Re: Newer eclipse port
- In reply to: Norbert Grundmann : "Newer eclipse port"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2024 13:55:32 UTC
On 2024-08-06 00:14, Norbert Grundmann wrote: > Hello All :-) > > I am using eclipse - and there is a port for R4.24. Many thanks to the > creator and those who keep it alive!!! It would be nice to have a newer > version - like R4.32. I am working to get a build for FreeBSD and took > a lot of stuff from the existing port R4.24. My first step is to get a > "compilation" process pass through, then check if it works and then make > a port. The latter I don't have experience - but if this would work - I > would like to be the maintainer of eclipse - as long as I can. > > Actually I made changes in adding files and patches - and the > compilation process is passing nearly 90% of all steps. But for SWT > Linux tests I have problems: > > # export ARCH=$(uname -p) > # export JAVA_HOME="/usr/local/openjdk17" > # export MAVEN_OPTS="-Xmx2048m" > # mvn -DskipTests=true -Dnative=gtk.freebsd.${ARCH} clean verify > > ... > [INFO] [bundle] Example for Eclipse URI Scheme Handling 1.2.300-SNAPSHOT > SUCCESS [ 0.915 s] > [INFO] [bundle] Tabbed Properties View Article Example 3.4.300-SNAPSHOT > SUCCESS [ 0.755 s] > [INFO] [bundle] Examples of Eclipse Forms 3.4.100-SNAPSHOT SUCCESS [ > 0.906 s] > [INFO] [bundle] Examples for Generic Editor 1.3.400-SNAPSHOT SUCCESS [ > 1.213 s] > [INFO] org.eclipse.platform.doc.tips 0.3.100-SNAPSHOT ..... SUCCESS [ > 0.497 s] > [INFO] [bundle] SWT Tools Base 3.107.600-SNAPSHOT ......... SUCCESS [ > 1.230 s] > [INFO] [bundle] SWT Tools Spy 3.109.400-SNAPSHOT .......... SUCCESS [ > 1.245 s] > [INFO] [bundle] SWT Tools 3.110.400-SNAPSHOT .............. SUCCESS [ > 1.447 s] > [INFO] [aggregator] bundles 4.32.0-SNAPSHOT ............... SUCCESS [ > 0.003 s] > [INFO] org.eclipse.swt.fragments.localbuild 3.105.0-SNAPSHOT SUCCESS [ > 0.126 s] > [INFO] [bundle] SWT Standalone Examples Plugin 3.108.400-SNAPSHOT > SUCCESS [ 1.736 s] > [INFO] [bundle] SWT Browser Demos Plugin 3.108.400-SNAPSHOT SUCCESS [ > 0.780 s] > [INFO] [bundle] SWT Launcher Example Plugin 3.108.300-SNAPSHOT SUCCESS > [ 0.727 s] > [INFO] org.eclipse.swt.examples.ole.win32 3.109.100-SNAPSHOT SUCCESS [ > 1.392 s] > [INFO] [bundle] SWT Views Example Plugin 3.108.400-SNAPSHOT SUCCESS [ > 0.649 s] > [INFO] [feature] SWT Tools 3.109.400-SNAPSHOT ............. SUCCESS [ > 0.469 s] > *[INFO] [test-bundle] Eclipse SWT Tests Linux/gtk 3.109.0-SNAPSHOT > FAILURE [ 0.099 s] > *[INFO] [bundle] Coordinator 1.5.300-SNAPSHOT .............. SKIPPED > [INFO] [bundle] Meta Type 1.6.600-SNAPSHOT ................ SKIPPED > [INFO] [bundle] User Admin Service 1.3.100-SNAPSHOT ....... SKIPPED > [INFO] [bundle] Configuration Admin 1.6.100-SNAPSHOT ...... SKIPPED > [INFO] [bundle] Device Access Service 1.2.100-SNAPSHOT .... SKIPPED > [INFO] [feature] Equinox Compendium SDK 3.23.100-SNAPSHOT . SKIPPED > [INFO] [bundle] Aspect Weaving Hooks Plug-in 1.4.100-SNAPSHOT SKIPPED > ... > > Actually I have a problem to fix this step. Maybe someone would have an > idea what could happen or where to look inside... [INFO] is (as the name implies) informative. ;) It's quite possible that those [bundle]s were skipped because they were unneeded/wanted. This often occurs when an option is not chosen/enabled. Or when a newer version of "feature" was compiled, with the older version reporting "SKIPPED". Best path forward? If it were me. I'd install it as you have it configured. If it works as expected. You're done. If not, you now probably know why, and what to do. Make deinstall will remove it for you. While preserving your current config/preferences. HTH > > All the best, Norbert > > -- > I love penguins at the south pole, windows in my house and apples on my > tree, but > not in my computer :) --Chris -- Be a measuring stick of quality. Not everyone is used to an environment where excellence is expected.