Re: pkg upgrade odity
- Reply: Miroslav Lachman : "Re: pkg upgrade odity"
- In reply to: Tatsuki Makino : "Re: pkg upgrade odity"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 09:59:33 UTC
On Tue 30 Apr 12:23, Tatsuki Makino wrote: > Hello. > > Baptiste Daroussin wrote on 2024/04/30 08:50: > > Le 29 avril 2024 22:33:09 GMT+02:00, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> a écrit : > >> > >> My notes from 2024-04-23: > >> > >> # pkg -r /tmp/be_mount.bN62 check -Ba > >> Checking all packages: > >> (0ad-0.0.26_23) /usr/local/bin/ActorEditor - required shared library ../../../binaries/system/libAtlasUI.so not found > >> Checking all packages... > > > > pkg check -d is rootdir safe pkg check -B is another beast I haven yet looked at it. > > If that another beast of -B is what you are referring to there, there is this report in Bugzilla. > https: //bugs.freebsd.org/ bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=261550 > I combat that to some extent :) > > The games/0ad/Makefile seems to have a do-install target that could cause that problem. > But if it is a shared library, such as a plugin used by dynamic loading, then pkg is probably doing too much checking. > But, I don't know anything about games/0ad, so this opinion of mine is most likely a hazardous guess. > > Regards. > now on the issue, first question regarding both the PR and Miroslav usage why are you running pkg check -B There are 0 reason to use it 99% of the time, this is a very specific option which from what I can read from this PR (and many others) and people notes, people tends to misused it. I will probably just remove the -B options from the next release of pkg. Bapt