From nobody Thu Apr 04 16:53:47 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4V9SPb72ncz5FbHP for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 16:53:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portmaster@bsdforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (udns.ultimatedns.net [24.113.41.81]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "ultimatedns.net", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4V9SPb40rsz4dp7 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 16:53:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portmaster@bsdforge.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 434Grm54008048; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 09:53:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from portmaster@bsdforge.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ultimatedns.net; s=mx99; t=1712249634; x=1712250234; r=y; bh=wi+11aJhcj4U09j4h/EIIiMTJVmHSm7OkrgW3aKQ6vA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=hC9BRINiCtDhPN55BcejgpF6ciUr1SNu80dHa0lIv/2qRPp5S7RrDyVzj/TihY5X8 vD8serOPl7aiB9Fm3+Y9docdn2VbUR5bEz8chVCqcagElun7efrxprU8YIRe8cqdNK EPnntpYOfNmUz6z9t3ff+QxYB9GM5UPXvBfnioqsq9Cavyy0MYT0NeDK1P9OtPcuOI NANVijGBjRc5ox1y5NqS7AVLiY9E7sOOb9dyiSD/CSPkoAncaLvtiOfHG5uAKP7+m8 meiyRnjrRlpCq3KG0OVi2S5bcvOtuQIccFvS0ciUisn22c61NroxysIgV/Uh75vCiB 9mCeCfBiGYDhg== List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 09:53:47 -0700 From: Chris To: Guido Falsi Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: poudriere(8) short circuits my ability to build packages In-Reply-To: <3f806699-7e0c-4722-a45f-d50d2a2a0739@madpilot.net> References: <78550638a3787fd0897093fdad463a00@bsdforge.com> <3f806699-7e0c-4722-a45f-d50d2a2a0739@madpilot.net> User-Agent: UDNSMS/17.0 Message-ID: X-Sender: portmaster@bsdforge.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11404, ipnet:24.113.0.0/16, country:US] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4V9SPb40rsz4dp7 On 2024-04-04 00:46, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 04/04/24 09:30, Chris wrote: >> I do all of my development in jails. As such I have no use for >> poudriere(8). >> But an attempt to build editors/vscode threw the following: >> >> The limit imposed by poudriere(8) for the maximum number of files allowed >> to be >> opened by a jail (default 1024) is exceeded during the build of vscode. >> To successfully build vscode with poudriere(8), you must add the following >> line to poudriere.conf: >> MAX_FILES_vscode=8192 >> >> What the... I just want to build a package. Why do I care about poudriere >> limitations, or poudriere at all? How can I just build a package. Users >> (or Maintainers) aren't forced to use poudriere, are they? >> > > The Makefile in editors/vscode has an error message including that text. It > always > writes it, so it assumes it is being built in poudriere. If that's not your > case > you can just ignore it. BUT, if you're building it in a jail (which is > similar to > what poudriere does), you should check your jail limits and make sure > maxfiles is > 8192 or higher. > > That is just a warning to poudriere users. Good to discover. Thank you very much for taking the time to inform me. That's good news. :) > > BTW while poudriere is definitely not mandatory for users, for port > maintainers it > is highly suggested: official packages are built using poudriere, so ports > must > work in poudriere, and maintainers should also verify and test that. Understood. I know it's an important point, and I respect it. I was just concerned that it was my *only* choice. I'm happy to discover it's not. :) Thanks again! -- --Chris Hutchinson