From nobody Thu Apr 04 16:07:44 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4V9RNK5rC5z5FWMp for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 16:07:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4V9RNK20mPz4X0b for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 16:07:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from pi (uid 104) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) id 2b183 by fc.opsec.eu (DragonFly Mail Agent v0.13+ on fc.opsec.eu); Thu, 04 Apr 2024 18:07:44 +0200 Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 18:07:44 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Chris Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , freebsd-ports Subject: Re: poudriere(8) short circuits my ability to build packages Message-ID: References: <78550638a3787fd0897093fdad463a00@bsdforge.com> <7aba89d38b4d0e84f8ba941452215f73@bsdforge.com> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7aba89d38b4d0e84f8ba941452215f73@bsdforge.com> X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4V9RNK20mPz4X0b Hi! > > hint using jail is not it, poudriere > > leverages jails, but we could do without jail while providing the same > > value. > Not if it imposes itself. It does not. The complexity of keeping such a huge number of interdepend ports/packages building and running is not imposed by poudriere, it's imposed by the general development pace. Having tools like poudriere helps enormously to keep things together. > If I've misunderstood the message reported to me by pkg(8) in my attempt > to create a package, and it *doesn't* prevent me from creating a > package in my chosen environment. It does not prevent you, but the port (not pkg) message is written in relation to poudriere. So yes, I think you misunderstood the message. To be fair, the topic is complicated and formulating a message that can not be misunderstood is non-trivial. -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ?