From nobody Mon Sep 25 01:15:46 2023
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
	by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Rv4gp5rrkz4tn80
	for <freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 01:15:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from fuz@fuz.su)
Received: from fuz.su (fuz.su [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:e508::1])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256
	 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256)
	(Client CN "fuz.su", Issuer "fuz.su" (not verified))
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Rv4gp2MWfz3NmV
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 01:15:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from fuz@fuz.su)
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
	none
Received: from fuz.su (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by fuz.su (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 38P1FkCt003530
	(version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
	Mon, 25 Sep 2023 03:15:46 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from fuz@fuz.su)
Received: (from fuz@localhost)
	by fuz.su (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 38P1FkiF003529;
	Mon, 25 Sep 2023 03:15:46 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from fuz)
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 03:15:46 +0200
From: Robert Clausecker <fuz@fuz.su>
To: qroxana <qroxana@protonmail.com>
Cc: "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Go and Rust ports PORTREVISION bump up question
Message-ID: <ZRDfQte5PO7tEtTA@fuz.su>
References: <5JtQsYbjhobDiFATZAEsiLcgrBdLmMgbhZR3xejYloFJj_U6TZvi8Rq5Qbg9HFTyHTWdLd_ZyS_6YJOAF0XKfH3zI_evvXRtD06SJXmq1xA=@protonmail.com>
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports
List-Help: <mailto:ports+help@freebsd.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ports@freebsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ports+subscribe@freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ports+unsubscribe@freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5JtQsYbjhobDiFATZAEsiLcgrBdLmMgbhZR3xejYloFJj_U6TZvi8Rq5Qbg9HFTyHTWdLd_ZyS_6YJOAF0XKfH3zI_evvXRtD06SJXmq1xA=@protonmail.com>
X-Spamd-Bar: ----
X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action;
	module=replies;
	Message is reply to one we originated
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00];
	REPLY(-4.00)[];
	ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:2001:41d0::/32, country:FR]
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Rv4gp2MWfz3NmV

Hi qroxana,

Go and rust ports statically link parts of the runtime provided by the
toolchain ports, but do not have a LIB_DEPENDS on it.  PORTREVISION is
bumped on toolchain update so the ports get rebuilt with the new version
of the toolchain and receive whatever standard library patches the
update comes with.

Yours,
Robert Clausecker

Am Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 01:07:52AM +0000 schrieb qroxana:
> Just curious, what is reason for bumping up the PORTREVISION of
> the GO and Rust ports, after lang/go or lang/rust is updated?
> 
> Thanks.

-- 
()  ascii ribbon campaign - for an 8-bit clean world 
/\  - against html email  - against proprietary attachments