From nobody Wed Sep 20 08:30:40 2023
X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
	by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4RrBYw1kXpz4tKSg
	for <ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 08:30:44 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pi@freebsd.org)
Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4RrBYv4zfgz4HdV
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 08:30:43 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pi@freebsd.org)
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
	none
Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.96 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <pi@freebsd.org>)
	id 1qisbY-000C49-1o;
	Wed, 20 Sep 2023 10:30:40 +0200
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 10:30:40 +0200
From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org>
To: Franco Fichtner <franco@lastsummer.de>
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: security/ca_root_nss: Remove duplicate PLIST entry
Message-ID: <ZQqtsIa-0Ni8rI1D@fc.opsec.eu>
References: <EAE8891D-0168-4879-BA59-067FAE37623F@lastsummer.de>
 <44a681dd-71cf-4946-bcdc-4928aeb02fd5@FreeBSD.org>
 <3C85B95F-A41E-4859-9D27-61D414AFC833@lastsummer.de>
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports
List-Help: <mailto:ports+help@freebsd.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ports@freebsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ports+subscribe@freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ports+unsubscribe@freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3C85B95F-A41E-4859-9D27-61D414AFC833@lastsummer.de>
X-Spamd-Bar: ----
X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action;
	module=replies;
	Message is reply to one we originated
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00];
	REPLY(-4.00)[];
	ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE]
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4RrBYv4zfgz4HdV

Hi!

> So what's the process here?
> 
> Contacted committer: no response
> Contacted ports mailing list: no technical discussion

It looks like it is really a non-trivial topic, so people
probably still think about it.

> Should I raise a bug ticket for the bug ticket with the patch
> that I wrote?

Yes, please.

> Should the ca_root_nss maintainer take a look
> who wasn't involved in the change that I raised concerns about?
> Do we not want to avoid further bug reports by doing review
> which wasn't possible for this blanket change in pahbricator?
> 
> I'm highly confused about the "open source" participation
> that is required of non-committers.  ;)

I agree, it's confusing.

-- 
pi@FreeBSD.org         +49 171 3101372                  Now what ?