From nobody Wed Sep 20 08:18:32 2023 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4RrBJ653dQz4tJYf for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 08:18:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from host64.shmhost.net (host64.shmhost.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:51d3::107:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4RrBJ545lwz4Gdd for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 08:18:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of franco@lastsummer.de has no SPF policy when checking 2a01:4f8:a0:51d3::107:1) smtp.mailfrom=franco@lastsummer.de; dmarc=none Received: from smtpclient.apple (p5490d02a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.144.208.42]) by host64.shmhost.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4RrBJ30zKQzP3fB for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 10:18:43 +0200 (CEST) From: Franco Fichtner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.600.7\)) Subject: Re: security/ca_root_nss: Remove duplicate PLIST entry Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 10:18:32 +0200 References: <44a681dd-71cf-4946-bcdc-4928aeb02fd5@FreeBSD.org> To: ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <44a681dd-71cf-4946-bcdc-4928aeb02fd5@FreeBSD.org> Message-Id: <3C85B95F-A41E-4859-9D27-61D414AFC833@lastsummer.de> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.600.7) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.10 at host64.shmhost.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.50 / 15.00]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.997]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.10)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/32, country:DE]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[lastsummer.de]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4RrBJ545lwz4Gdd So what's the process here? Contacted committer: no response Contacted ports mailing list: no technical discussion Should I raise a bug ticket for the bug ticket with the patch that I wrote? Should the ca_root_nss maintainer take a look who wasn't involved in the change that I raised concerns about? Do we not want to avoid further bug reports by doing review which wasn't possible for this blanket change in pahbricator? I'm highly confused about the "open source" participation that is required of non-committers. ;) Cheers, Franco > On 19. Sep 2023, at 1:42 PM, Renato Botelho wrote: >=20 > On 19/09/23 05:58, Franco Fichtner wrote: >> Hi, >> Looking at this "blanket" change I'm not sure this is a good way to = bring in without discussion >> and especially without a revision change: >> = https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/security/ca_root_nss?id=3D574c939ecc= d322 >> The relevant bug was reported here: >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D262755 >> And I'd suggest rolling back that recent change or making a better = effort at explaining the >> problem it solves. >=20 > According to the commit log, those files are already handled by = @sample entries on pkg-plist so nothing is gonna change on final = package. > --=20 > Renato Botelho >=20