Re: Does anyone has patch for math/py-scikit-umfpack ?
- In reply to: Thierry Thomas : "Re: Does anyone has patch for math/py-scikit-umfpack ?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 12:33:32 UTC
Hi, Thierry !
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 02:43:05 +0900,
Thierry Thomas wrote:
>
> [1 <text/plain; utf-8 (quoted-printable)>]
> Le lun. 16 oct. 23 .AN` 12:26:07 +0200, KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko <kiri@truefc.org>
> .ANicrivaitN :
> > Hi, list
>
> Hello,
>
> > I'm building audio/audacity package, but failed at
> > math/py-scikit-umfpack:
>
> I just submitted PR 274518 with a patch from GH:
> <https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274518>
Fine! py39-scikit-umfpack-0.3.3_2 has been succesefully
built by sanitaly change (maybe typo):
--- math_py-scikit-umfpack.diff~ 2023-10-17 16:28:18.004562000 +0900
+++ math_py-scikit-umfpack.diff 2023-10-17 21:18:41.559313000 +0900
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}scipy>0:science/py-scipy@${PY_FLAVOR} \
swig:devel/swig
LIB_DEPENDS= libamd.so:math/suitesparse-amd \
-+ libcblas.so::math/cblas \
++ libcblas.so:math/cblas \
libopenblas.so:math/openblas \
libumfpack.so:math/suitesparse-umfpack
RUN_DEPENDS= ${PYNUMPY} \
> With this patch it builds, but the tests are still failing, and I don.FN"t
> know how it can be used$B!D(B Could you please check it?
Are those tests are runtime ones ? What troublesomes appear
in running ?
Anyway all packages that needs in my desktop has beed built
[1]. Thanks for help.
[1] ftp://ftp.truefc.org/pub/FreeBSD/packages/freebsd/amd64/amd64/15.0C/9b03a5de73d4.xij/9ce8c29b90c7/All/
Best regards
---
Kazuhiko Kiriyama