Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch

On 16/10/2023 13:07, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 16/10/23 13:03, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote:
>> On 16/10/2023 12:57, Guido Falsi wrote:
>>> On 16/10/23 11:19, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote:
>>>> I found this one after a full rebuild in Poudriere:
>>>>
>>>> ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libssl.so.11" not found, required by 
>>>> "transmission-daemon"
>>>>
>>>
>>> I guess you will need to force rebuild/reinstall all packages 
>>> depending on openssl.
>>>
>>> (if I understand correctly you're using poudriere-bulk(8) to build 
>>> yout binary packages repo)
>>>
>>> Actually poudriere should have been able to rebuild them itself, 
>>> unless you're using the -S option, which could have skipped some 
>>> rebuilds that in this case are needed.
>>>
>>> If you have a broken repo (due to -S or some other unknown reason) 
>>> you will need to rebuild it from scratch (-c option) to get a 
>>> pristine and hopefully working one.
>>>
>> This is Poudriere, everything was rebuilt from the ground up.
>>
>
> I see, but you did not report, did you "pkg upgrade -f" everything 
> depending on openssl? I'm not sure pkg will figure it out by itself 
> that it needs to do that in your case.
>
> It looks like you still have old binaries on your system. If poudriere 
> did end the build them all successfully it would be strange it would 
> have generated so many non working binaries without experiencing 
> failures during the build.
>

pkg upgrade -fy && service -R on the hosts; this is not my 1st, or even 
100th rodeo..