Re: Port update and consumers bump

Please take a look at:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274367

Thanks all!

Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@freebsd.org> escreveu no dia sábado, 7/10/2023 à(s)
13:30:

> Thanks Moin!
>
> Now I have understand it.
>
> I will use:
>
> git grep -e 'USE_WX' --and \( -e 3.0+ -e 3.2 \)
> Looks for a line that has USE_WX and either 3.0+ or 3.2. (3.2+ will be
> included too)
>
> Cheers
>
> Moin Rahman <bofh@freebsd.org> escreveu no dia sábado, 7/10/2023 à(s)
> 13:03:
>
>>
>>
>> > On Oct 7, 2023, at 2:00 PM, Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > This 3.2 search might be counterproductive as we have an option "3.0+"
>> which also indicates 3.2 as a valid value.
>> >
>> > ports with 3.0+ will use 3.0 for building without changes . For this
>> particular update involving 3.2 shouldn't we focus on consumers using 3.2
>> only?
>>
>> The answer is both yes and no. :)
>>
>> There are some corner cases like let's say there is port A which was
>> built using 3.2 and there is now port B which has 3.0+ and is now being
>> built. There is a high chance that it will use the already available 3.2
>> rather than building 3.0. That's why it's better to be safe than sorry and
>> also bump those ports.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Moin(bofh@ with all hats off)
>>
>
>
> --
> Nuno Teixeira
> FreeBSD Committer (ports)
>


-- 
Nuno Teixeira
FreeBSD Committer (ports)