From nobody Sun Oct 01 15:45:47 2023 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Rz7j509gsz4vTHD; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 15:46:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Rz7j02v91z3HQX; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 15:45:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=netfence.it header.s=202304 header.b="NzosX/jA"; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 78.134.96.152 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=netfence.it Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.17.2/8.17.1) with ESMTPSA id 391FjlIt026514 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 1 Oct 2023 17:45:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfence.it; s=202304; t=1696175148; bh=jLSf+24mX9B4kbUrYvipPS+qZEblSdhtP3ZoqsqrPSY=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:Cc; b=NzosX/jAiIDzk2f1A1dIldMMK8lyXupiwPZnINRYTS7F/z7YwHkFcHDKJFkjowFbH nUxwMrKgagSYdk6levyh5uAOSgRK5qufukBfnAxRhAiFzy/J3y5GgxDr3+3gEu+Gju txdDfTExent4GmWl7S0+Ldax/yEo4cqGW8yKN6P8= X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be [10.1.2.18] Message-ID: Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2023 17:45:47 +0200 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird From: Andrea Venturoli Subject: ThunderBird 115 slow and unresponsive To: ports@freebsd.org Cc: gecko@FreeBSD.org Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.79 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW_WITH_FAILURES(-0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.134.96.152]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[gecko@FreeBSD.org,ports@freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; BLOCKLISTDE_FAIL(0.00)[78.134.96.152:server fail]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ASN(0.00)[asn:35612, ipnet:78.134.0.0/17, country:IT]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(0.00)[netfence.it,none]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[netfence.it:-]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_REJECT(0.00)[netfence.it:s=202304]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Rz7j02v91z3HQX Hello. In the latest day I upgraded ThunderBird and got 115.3.0. Well, it's *SO* *MUCH* slower and less unresponsive than 102, it makes me think something is wrong. E.g. Dragging the separator between message list and message preview was real time on 102; on 115 you drag it, release the mouse button, and after a second the panes resize. Selecting a bunch of messages and moving them to a different folder used to be close to immediate on 102. On 115 the window is repainted a couple of times after each message is moved. So to move, let's say, 20 messages, 10-15 seconds are needed. I've not used 115 much on other platforms, but as far as I can remember, I didn't notice such an unresponsiveness. So is there something wrong in the FreeBSD port? Something to tweak? Was there some infrastructural change in the UI? Is anyone else experiencing this? bye & Thanks av. P.S. I build TB myself with poudriere.