Re: graphics/podofo: 0.10.x requirement

On 27/05/23 19:37, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 27/05/23 13:24, Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote:
>>
>>      >
>>      >> plan 2 - Another option is doing the same as above, but my 
>> updating
>>      >> podofo to the latest version and moving old 0.9.x to a
>>     graphics/podofo09
>>      >> (or whatever) port, updating all dependencies to use the older
>>     port for now.
>>      >
>>      > Also fine.
>>      >
>>
>>
>> I'd like to choose plan 2.
> 
> Since you are the maintainer, I'll be happy to align myself with this 
> preference.
> 
>>
>>
>>
>>     Suspected that, I'm also waiting for sunpoet (as podofo maintainer)
>>     opinion. Maybe he also already has a plan or is working on something
>>     that I don't know about.
>>
>>
>> Guido, do you have a patch for podofo and calibre already?
>> Since podofo has only 5 dependent ports, it should be possible to test 
>> them all with podofo (0.10.0) and move incompatible ones to podofo09.
>>
> 
> I admit I did not count the dependencies. With such a number your plan 
> is definitely the best one.
> 
> I have no patches at present, before investing time in this I thought 
> I'd check what the situation is and if work is already underway.
> 
> I'll start looking into it, except I'm at present busy with a strange 
> xfce4 issue I need to address.
> 
> Give me a few days to look into this.
> 

Hi all,

I created a review for this, could you all take a look and give feedback?

https://reviews.freebsd.org/D40328

Thanks in advance!

-- 
Guido Falsi <madpilot@FreeBSD.org>