From nobody Sun May 28 17:11:53 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4QTlh54qMDz4XdZ9 for ; Sun, 28 May 2023 17:16:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QTlh51zjTz3k4T for ; Sun, 28 May 2023 17:16:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2af1c884b08so31646151fa.1 for ; Sun, 28 May 2023 10:16:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1685294211; x=1687886211; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5p5b1qRGeFmailfASM6aS/S5oxmCMCQFsMzzqz/TEy0=; b=XT5Dd+WF6uOnUHsLyH9OQEJgTk4ycNVYlcurZ+1rgIvZD7tq+d9e41xqDrvBbIwxYU K5r5kTQcLQQkVCWwgpOnuOYED23QRWsrlipRJvnBMRClBUZ5PNLy5CnRLNOI87geN5x0 j2leAaU9vyWb3jhIm6QoArLc4/onXHOqGyrO95ke6371y9lCgUg54IQwtepDL8lnMJBS 5AsaSHzZlf8Nx9gs7jBYriYJXmIsIOki3Fnk8fB51o6NblOprufanVp/0hUWyKj9yjqo cHEqkJkPvp2auTopmaUPzEn9YaiUfUg4nk42N3H34Hpjjegtewnv9MJ36lh/UK6jtx7P 6Uuw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1685294211; x=1687886211; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=5p5b1qRGeFmailfASM6aS/S5oxmCMCQFsMzzqz/TEy0=; b=k3tWEZ/lp97yvK48w2AE3F4/dvff1Bjzo0g5MEop7enf+YM8DQi1gewJKbMJo5jjgd ClF2BvR4EZykTaa0dSQAwc9jICmZRiDrMA5vKSyMvRQ0D0EC5EfXughNgFMmHdO/n3Ic H4QFXnjp2aQtmaK7wshMFqABnpMBCqIpI9TLEID5ZX8XYwcOcOEJlqfCemYyDp6CpwR8 7cpUecO7sTfAtVp2ZI4WghbEInzrmGUWYpfu1BPc8ly4SwEfYrj27HZjrfm1cVIPXBFO jWs63PVdEcfviiLozw783aIRlibM7zCGi/cpvYLkQqmeHuubMwge706ZBnRcrVYpG+VT NrSw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDyeqx+tFDMhIWTFAiBYwSxv8q2UyNA6crWuetaE8cABABqTdNse JVwQEs581dDexZIYQLdTJpYVIereo+y/1SwHxsV/gdAB X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4g+R8JipwZYG9GPELlvnnoF/zI21P/bnEVzm+nAoHwBHH8E3IOqpO1WzQ9SfAUeVYLXCMJTgGlNuvzg+W9k0I= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b10c:0:b0:2b0:2214:f808 with SMTP id p12-20020a2eb10c000000b002b02214f808mr2380822ljl.16.1685294211182; Sun, 28 May 2023 10:16:51 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 19:11:53 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to test GUI ports within their poudriere jails? To: "Edward Sanford Sutton, III" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ccb43905fcc42220" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4QTlh51zjTz3k4T X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US] X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N --000000000000ccb43905fcc42220 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 2:03=E2=80=AFAM Edward Sanford Sutton, III < mirror176@hotmail.com> wrote: > Is there a preferred way to test GUI ports function correctly within > poudriere? Wondering if there is a workflow to do so instead of just > creating an install on a second computer or in a virtual machine. My > primary goal is to be able to confirm it still functions properly with > minimal runtime dependencies as my main FreeBSD system is a desktop with > many things installed so would contaminate that check. > I have a jail + Xnest for that. Works fine. However, note that this approach won't catch a number of runtime problems. Cheers. > > Thanks, > Edward Sanford Sutton, III > > --000000000000ccb43905fcc42220 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=
On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 2:03=E2=80=AF= AM Edward Sanford Sutton, III <= mirror176@hotmail.com> wrote:
Is there a preferred way to test GUI ports function co= rrectly within
poudriere? Wondering if there is a workflow to do so instead of just
creating an install on a second computer or in a virtual machine. My
primary goal is to be able to confirm it still functions properly with
minimal runtime dependencies as my main FreeBSD system is a desktop with many things installed so would contaminate that check.

I have a jail + Xnest for that. Works fine. However, note t= hat this approach won't catch a number of runtime problems.
<= br>
Cheers.
=C2=A0

Thanks,
Edward Sanford Sutton, III

--000000000000ccb43905fcc42220--