From nobody Sat May 27 17:37:37 2023 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4QT8BY0Sycz4V5HS for ; Sat, 27 May 2023 17:37:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QT8BX6zhkz3xbw; Sat, 27 May 2023 17:37:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1685209061; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vw1HfFw8nHA25ENbUYmryAqGvKXf93VAFnECOp5q2AI=; b=hZTUbrH/i8d11iA3c4VIrYNo1zPHwKkG30r6bA3rQh1KsvsCc8fGiEpD8MiX6tnY4cYijm RVPjWsgJwWNPEbrXmN3AQX1YKGhuXz4LiCZs5c9FgjzSfd0JhyqCgSH5H9yJFnMuT5178e /Ei61kL1JNVi4Tzw75qhuoZtdpT5EUiUdBDEJjPbOlUvoz83cOuixbR8Y+x1kJjc+4KLRG eP6Pw4VcXytQsBcfGOEBWvXhvC7jIElZUcaz5BLHMJUzYvs5sR9DjiZ/042jWmC1foqd+h bSbPSaTVgHP8hsO0XXcMsE2NrcD4cZcxrX9ufLjezWtpf2XNO5akzar9gd7JSg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1685209061; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vw1HfFw8nHA25ENbUYmryAqGvKXf93VAFnECOp5q2AI=; b=OCw27o9Hw5duNqcDnvpMJozavUCPvjJH8Jaro5R4h8XOwdBqCxOmKpZJULpeiPFedwPdx/ 2bHRZ08xRbnMYTKlvBn4+me1pBDwWn0qC1AF6bZmNVEyVMvZJ7QwxI61dH5XVoWlad35wT EkxYetrTfyKCUzyYGyPU4V5agtlE2NZSPVsvZ9pdCPeFEeP9J2KzUTGZ6LtsWsMoIE5elP +G8JI/OXhNnQ+xFbieMbjJS0m0GxegQ0/nwxB7i4N5E64hTltQLxSWvrBinxYbJMFIYMWD 92RSuQHhbkxWWN0Ry9uhdkK6q8jbvVjrjYZPZYv9dPQs+/xIk1R2KJj1Oglcfw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1685209061; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=C57NDqrLOhVdJVUaNw8QYBUSGiuCTxbpzFmtRR1jPu7NlsWZHqOnFcSQQl3p5haaSPPCk/ f0KzC0r+NOg6Lz+BrPEXwZ5pcNm0rcOtGlztfgBINXbmfeYx/4MlrGhKglrwl3YoM3XKqh wvBDyS8PibN+27/UI5YLPRXlMEIv8bQ8gF2a80Wr8g00YpBQA/bRxHf5BuCcjQc5ZftZyM RXRHjw9E3yGffakXRLbkn3UIuidBjgOlaApsf4Ca4F03j7EHhV0FEp70k69ZVs11yqL2Fw l5vuQW6Z5IxNySsw5N8k7L6RX/ofkqv69mPnSNztxhVA0rk2hlkXfTe54e3cjg== Received: from [IPV6:2a01:e11:2002:4280::13:1] (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e11:2002:4280::13:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: madpilot/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4QT8BX2j9fzK95; Sat, 27 May 2023 17:37:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <9ed35763-6a9d-c188-29e0-ed8c07a39019@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 27 May 2023 19:37:37 +0200 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.1 Subject: Re: graphics/podofo: 0.10.x requirement To: Po-Chuan Hsieh Cc: Kurt Jaeger , "ports@FreeBSD.org Ports" References: <3e5e10a3-75e7-795e-edbf-378bcb4999a4@FreeBSD.org> <061bc038-bf20-ad47-f571-eb153ccce092@FreeBSD.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Guido Falsi In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 27/05/23 13:24, Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote: > > > > >> plan 2 - Another option is doing the same as above, but my updating > >> podofo to the latest version and moving old 0.9.x to a > graphics/podofo09 > >> (or whatever) port, updating all dependencies to use the older > port for now. > > > > Also fine. > > > > > I'd like to choose plan 2. Since you are the maintainer, I'll be happy to align myself with this preference. > > > > Suspected that, I'm also waiting for sunpoet (as podofo maintainer) > opinion. Maybe he also already has a plan or is working on something > that I don't know about. > > > Guido, do you have a patch for podofo and calibre already? > Since podofo has only 5 dependent ports, it should be possible to test > them all with podofo (0.10.0) and move incompatible ones to podofo09. > I admit I did not count the dependencies. With such a number your plan is definitely the best one. I have no patches at present, before investing time in this I thought I'd check what the situation is and if work is already underway. I'll start looking into it, except I'm at present busy with a strange xfce4 issue I need to address. Give me a few days to look into this. -- Guido Falsi