Re: graphics/podofo: 0.10.x requirement
- Reply: Po-Chuan Hsieh : "Re: graphics/podofo: 0.10.x requirement"
- In reply to: Kurt Jaeger : "Re: graphics/podofo: 0.10.x requirement"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 15:18:36 UTC
On 26/05/23 17:13, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As the maintainer of the calibre port, while trying to update to 6.18.x >> I've discovered that now calibre requires the new API/ABI incompatible >> podofo 0.10 version. >> >> I also guess that other ports will also grow such requirements in the >> future. >> >> So my question, both general and to the sunpoet as podofo maintainer, >> is, how should we address this? >> >> Also, is this already being addressed, maybe? >> >> We can't simply update graphics/podofo, obviously (all dependent ports >> would brake). >> >> Plan 1 - My first idea is creating a graphics/podofo10 port that can be >> installed in parallel with graphics/podofo (by changing the name of >> every file installed that conflicts), so that ports moving to the newer >> library can be patched to use the newer one. > > That's how it is done for other dependencies in other ports sometimes. > > netbox and gitlab often have such cases. > >> plan 2 - Another option is doing the same as above, but my updating >> podofo to the latest version and moving old 0.9.x to a graphics/podofo09 >> (or whatever) port, updating all dependencies to use the older port for now. > > Also fine. > Suspected that, I'm also waiting for sunpoet (as podofo maintainer) opinion. Maybe he also already has a plan or is working on something that I don't know about. -- Guido Falsi <madpilot@FreeBSD.org>