From nobody Sat May 06 05:23:07 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4QCwtr4JpXz493lq for ; Sat, 6 May 2023 05:23:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kozlov@ravenloft.kiev.ua) Received: from ravenloft.kiev.ua (ravenloft.kiev.ua [46.173.149.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QCwtq6sHtz4Q08 for ; Sat, 6 May 2023 05:23:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kozlov@ravenloft.kiev.ua) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Date: Sat, 6 May 2023 07:23:07 +0200 From: Alex Kozlov To: Derek Schrock Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: removing mutt patches Message-ID: <20230506052307.GA22563@ravenloft.kiev.ua> References: <20230505050400.GA96444@ravenloft.kiev.ua> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4QCwtq6sHtz4Q08 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:34743, ipnet:46.173.128.0/19, country:UA] X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 01:18:43PM -0400, Derek Schrock wrote: > On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 01:04:00AM EDT, Alex Kozlov wrote: > > I use %I specifier from vvv.initials (QUOTE_PATCH option), but have vvv.quote > > commented out in the port's Makefile. I don't remember exactly why, it seems > > caused some formatting issues. > It seems you're already building locally? If that patch did go away you > would be able to include that patch as a local EXTRA_PATCH_TREE or worse > use neomutt? This is external to the ports tree patch, so not EXTRA_PATCH_TREE but Makefile modification, but yes, it's my plan B. And perhaps it's time to check neomutt. > I think maybe the current plan is to remove quote patch keep init. patch > (on by default) maybe change the option name and try to pull in more It still changes quoting behaviour, so I don't see why change option name. > feedback from mutt-users (already posted there) and UPDATING (everyone > monitors that file right?) Sounds like a good plan. -- Alex