Re: INDEX-12 gotten by portsnap is not updated
- In reply to: Colin Percival : "Re: INDEX-12 gotten by portsnap is not updated"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 05 May 2023 15:19:12 UTC
* Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> [20230505 08:12]: > Older bmake handles ${FOO:%=bar%} with an empty FOO by matching % to the > empty string. In 2020, NetBSD changed this to non-matching "for gmake > compatibility". That's indeed a weak reason, I would have expected the reason to be "do what original AT&T make did" :o > I don't think either approach is wrong per se, but obviously problems can > arise when the behaviour changes. ;-) Definitely. Ok, I will eliminate this, it doesn't seem to be well-defined how it *should* behave. But hey, still not a bad thing to upgrade the portsnap env ;) Cheers, Felix -- Felix Palmen <zirias@FreeBSD.org> {private} felix@palmen-it.de -- ports committer (mentee) -- {web} http://palmen-it.de {pgp public key} http://palmen-it.de/pub.txt {pgp fingerprint} 6936 13D5 5BBF 4837 B212 3ACC 54AD E006 9879 F231