From nobody Mon Mar 06 20:47:32 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PVrHf3VxQz3wMcj for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 20:47:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grembo@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PVrHf0K2Pz4W4h for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 20:47:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grembo@freebsd.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 24330f8c; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 20:47:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id a3d40ae8 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Mon, 6 Mar 2023 20:47:33 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date From: Michael Gmelin In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 21:47:32 +0100 Cc: FreeBSD Ports Message-Id: References: To: Dave Horsfall X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (20D67) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4PVrHf0K2Pz4W4h X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE] X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N > On 6. Mar 2023, at 21:29, Dave Horsfall wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFOn Mon, 6 Mar 2023, portscout@FreeBSD.org wrote: >=20 > [...] >=20 >> ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------= ------ >> cad/ifcopenshell | 0.6.0 | blend= erbim-230306 >> ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------= ------ >=20 > If "ifcopenshell" (whatever that is) is so unstable as to require daily > patches then perhaps it should never have been released? Or is this an > underhanded way to promote "blenderbim" (whatever that is)? >=20 Or maybe - just maybe - portscout accidentally picked up a branch as a new v= ersion? -m