Re: poudriere-devel based llvm16-16.0.0.r3 build got: "pkg-static: pkg_checksum_hash_sha256_file(read failed): Is a directory"
- Reply: Mark Millard : "Re: poudriere-devel based aarch64 llvm16-16.0.0.r3 build got: bad make -VBE_FREEBSD_PLIST_FILES result leads to "pkg-static: pkg_checksum_hash_sha256_file(read failed): Is a directory""
- In reply to: Mark Millard : "poudriere-devel based llvm16-16.0.0.r3 build got: "pkg-static: pkg_checksum_hash_sha256_file(read failed): Is a directory""
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2023 09:52:49 UTC
On Mar 5, 2023, at 00:03, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote: > My poudriere-devel based ports update got: > > =======================<phase: package >============================ > . . . > ===> Building package for llvm16-16.0.0.r3 > pkg-static: pkg_checksum_hash_sha256_file(read failed): Is a directory > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/llvm16 > > FYI: This was my first time attempting to build llvm16 > as one of the ports. > > I see that, for example, > > http://ampere3.nyi.freebsd.org/build.html?mastername=131arm64-default&build=d0f8db852755 > > reports success with building (and, so, packaging) > llvm16-16.0.0.r3 . I've no clue why the distinction. > > For reference: > > port directory: /usr/ports/devel/llvm16 > package name: llvm16-16.0.0.r3 > building for: FreeBSD CA72_ZFS 13.1-RELEASE-p7 FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE-p7 arm64 > . . . > Poudriere version: poudriere-git-3.3.99.20220831 > Host OSVERSION: 1400081 > Jail OSVERSION: 1301000 > > Of 227 ports, this was the only one to fail to build. > llvm15 and gcc12 were built. > > This was on a HoneyComb (16 Cortex-A72's). > > poudriere-devel is now building ports, targeting main > instead of targeting releng/13.1 . We will see how > that goes building the same 227 ports. > > It will be some time before I'll retest building for > releng/13.1 in order to check on repeatability. > > # uname -apKU > FreeBSD CA72_16Gp_ZFS 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #88 main-n261230-e78dc78e517a-dirty: Wed Mar 1 16:17:45 PST 2023 root@CA72_16Gp_ZFS:/usr/obj/BUILDs/main-CA72-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/arm64.aarch64/sys/GENERIC-NODBG-CA72 arm64 aarch64 1400081 1400081 > The build for main also failed. One difference in my build vs. the FreeBSD build servers is the use of BE_NATIVE instead of BE_STANDARD . May be the pkg-plist is mishandled for BE_NATIVE ? === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com