From nobody Fri Mar 03 16:35:05 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PStqj5dwGz3w61R for ; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 16:35:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PStqj3WRdz3jjx; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 16:35:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.95 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1pY8N8-000G4g-0E; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 17:35:06 +0100 Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2023 17:35:05 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Jan Martin Mikkelsen Cc: Gleb Popov , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Possible regression in "make all-depends-list" Message-ID: References: <3EE35107-6152-4144-AFBC-CBD61EECB1AF@transactionware.com> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4PStqj3WRdz3jjx X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi! > >> On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 6:35 PM Jan Martin Mikkelsen > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Running “make all-depends-list” on the hs-pandoc port shows none of the dependencies listed in the USE_CABAL variable in the Makefile. In the 2022Q2 branch, these dependencies were included. [...] > > This case still seems to be a regression, as far as I can see. > I tracked down the problem with the missing dependencies. This fixes it for me. [...] > Should I open a bug? Yes, please. -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ?