From nobody Wed Jun 28 15:45:41 2023 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4QrmBc5bcXz4kGGJ for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:45:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DutchDaemon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QrmBc59f0z4HGr for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:45:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DutchDaemon@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1687967144; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=oM1RCRnoh9BPqlEimeF6y7O/Q3ccqu6EPq+h/LXLBTc=; b=yeIBo5vLn6JO7c0mpEn2haoaPYdtf6aRXp2Cp7KVCHNpDSHQioe3DUROGfAmTMdkPsygoE EvwoJs9W+P5Nbxy/12vBR3yv8NkzUGJXu/9pwip3UuxiErAofU8HfX4PxeKgRTna0Y54UH +TTdql6JdyNZkgvdAeIxYIyzJH8MYtdj6N6SIp3AkGBTjxuWd8TXRH6pqQ92A9nrM+wK59 TEeqVnJ0upe66rzWFDIQp2sRectfqv59/bBU5ss1ZJcxsZIPrutiB2RAblCRnjZZRXTHhK qEH+rinAslW2YEmPGNn6DpjyQQ9IIwddiZbe3t1ysty54Nlzt+NvT9z7yLE1bg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1687967144; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=oM1RCRnoh9BPqlEimeF6y7O/Q3ccqu6EPq+h/LXLBTc=; b=wgI4cGRv5/Epx8PZKyzuI5UqCd/3U8Y/ejzBxEoVC2pBTijY5mctfNyz4KEYTTBaEW+qQ7 l93lA80gzrVh5MO3kncamU8iIqwnTDcKoLv8U1qEODiW7ueRpQmO86eeLBL4PuuT0JN8Ug KbhRVliNWyk3vCWpwwes6UqGssPCeSGDhxajE4UrsPbreTtV2XqbcDgmtNUiP5gTOc30rL h81CC/maNB0WRKyS65kfRnHpgU6dq2J8fgAKUFefro+VcRIQUrs/ksEMNRHpyKz6N2W1FF +CnohaajZMU789gJHxuiPfoctrvSsq3/2FuMBmH9hVipSDXU80CVUpjODukj1Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1687967144; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=gxEneQc7Iino1eroc8aJpCXssziw6ayP2oSTRSntF4hPc9t39fx1Z0sUuK7XI8NTrLuwWf vkmwRGTIbcxaITLeqNs8MKtXXtLwJ42Hw+c6TQZ4Hyxc6cUCAzEFOzmXkoDIPQu3F5cig/ bK9nWV8i4HL3UItlFM5hSMkj1x3S+CjVFxi89IRsaO7QOkb/jbGKYEskpMkT1veHANekZD FVs9nQWAK4zb5mjbDcur1EaBWXn6mdrWwx6VjrvVh866M9xrRD/ZhPnOUopV+kLvw8h3MM Nt83ZjSVtrjGNRL4gEibqZnzxRTuXWeV1jJFTXsLav+29UJzqcXx03yEMyluvA== Received: from [192.168.178.205] (unknown [85.148.89.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: dutchdaemon/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4QrmBc1sTGzfWx for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:45:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DutchDaemon@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <8b950975-0725-d8e1-eee0-74772a10c0db@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 17:45:41 +0200 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0 Subject: Re: Update or delete port, how to decide? Content-Language: nl, en-US To: ports@freebsd.org References: <556369839.305716.1687966842344.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <556369839.305716.1687966842344@mail.yahoo.com> From: DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator Organization: The FreeBSD Forums In-Reply-To: <556369839.305716.1687966842344@mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------30y3w3BJk0UzwpyNVdFOWLFK" X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --------------30y3w3BJk0UzwpyNVdFOWLFK Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------0mjVDFTLAdIwjLOuFvoIE1lv"; protected-headers="v1" From: DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <8b950975-0725-d8e1-eee0-74772a10c0db@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Update or delete port, how to decide? References: <556369839.305716.1687966842344.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <556369839.305716.1687966842344@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <556369839.305716.1687966842344@mail.yahoo.com> --------------0mjVDFTLAdIwjLOuFvoIE1lv Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------U5YQIRHjv6x6ExRFHHOCFv30" --------------U5YQIRHjv6x6ExRFHHOCFv30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 T24gMjgvMDYvMjAyMyAxNzo0MCwgU3RlcGhlbiBSb3pub3dza2kgd3JvdGU6DQo+IEkgcmVj ZW50bHkgZ290IGFuIGVtYWlsIGZyb20gdGhlIHBhY2thZ2UgYnVpbGRpbmcgbWFjaGluZSAo MTQtY3VycmVudCkgDQo+IGFib3V0IGEgcG9ydCAobWFpbC94bWFpbCkgdGhhdCBJIGNyZWF0 ZWQgcXVpdGUgYSBudW1iZXIgb2YgeWVhcnMgYWdvIA0KPiB0aGF0IG5vIGxvbmdlciB3YW50 cyB0byBidWlsZC4NCj4NCj4gSXMgdGhlcmUgYSB3YXkgdG8gdGVsbCBpZiBhbnlvbmUgaXMg c3RpbGwgdXNpbmcgaXQgc28gSSBjYW4gZmlndXJlIG91dCANCj4gaWYgSSB3YW50IHRvIGlu dmVzdCB0aGUgdGltZSBpbiBhIG1ham9yIHVwZGF0ZSB0byB0aGUgcG9ydCwgb3Igd2hldGhl ciANCj4gaXQgc2hvdWxkIGp1c3QgYmUgcmVtb3ZlZC4NCj4NCj4gVGhhbmtzLA0KPiBTdGV2 ZSBSb3pub3dza2kNCk90aGVyIHRoYW4gYW5hbHl6aW5nIGRvd25sb2FkIHN0YXRzIGZyb20g DQpmdHA6Ly9mdHAuZ3dkZy5kZS9wdWIveDExL3gub3JnL2NvbnRyaWIvYXBwbGljYXRpb25z L3htYWlsXzEuNi50YXIuZ3ogDQp0aGVyZSBpcyByZWFsbHkgbm90IG11Y2ggZWxzZSB0byBn byBvbi4NCg== --------------U5YQIRHjv6x6ExRFHHOCFv30 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 28/06/2023 17:40, Stephen Roznowski= wrote:
I recently got an email fr= om the package building machine (14-current) about a port (mail/xmail) that I created quite a number of years ago that no longer wants to build.

Is there a way to tell if anyone is still using it so I can figure out if I want to invest the time in a major update to the port, or whether it should just be removed.

Thanks,
Steve Roznowski
Other than analyzing download stats from ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/x11/x.= org/contrib/applications/xmail_1.6.tar.gz there is really not much else to go on.
--------------U5YQIRHjv6x6ExRFHHOCFv30-- --------------0mjVDFTLAdIwjLOuFvoIE1lv-- --------------30y3w3BJk0UzwpyNVdFOWLFK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsF5BAABCAAjFiEE9AWUvcZu/lO5r3wZ0R2eb0cya6gFAmScVaUFAwAAAAAACgkQ0R2eb0cya6hg sA/9EWMXfxr234LxxFQAh30zeYXT1wut2R1MSF9RN3uDY9NDeXAXxOY+Z3GdJQCHloe0hed63rjV RwLTbl0XtVQFFST0PDF7ZpacvmxZv/vxtU46hdotCkX6wlXlNkcpsa0/4vX59pGA7r/GS4GHkUsD tijNw0cmdeXggM+idF8xREerxEgzco2tA7Rrr2MIB1EctQY1LNkwvhdsx19RAqD489SNoIvyugjO Dgro3VfaGWKaRTyATRR1j3dJ9g/zPorJGvHW33gvyE6VLZoogOgUQWOn1UHmdfPdFy1LRr/nBpjS CzV/jod/TR4tGU79LdLWntq6UTZd0jIGrxRtAZ6D8/dtd5VNkPY2vx6cReU2eygi1Q8ubjqy8a2P cTVWdrI3OFxl6eb1+lrArWvGxyyAeEMZlqbLcZnfOKlAukHWcONCHlLOlRJkdACSgWinSTp4UgvD wtdawewcQ+zQsehqxvSokc5ruTi4KPf5OrWObMYcxQc+j49emzTotjX/t5a2KNQQLiZ8+Mc4KCjF imGXrHhw59Argg0SYEhgPFKClfksEqSqhvRijudvBU/BWW7zBcHf0VcXjgDhHXWdbgcF2UtEHsCa Z2K19wKZVTULScFLhcve5P+lHoZ49uV40M+rSIyWfF79bE84SjkyC+tRSnYkRqQGZPMqDDYeH8f0 JPo= =IVZh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------30y3w3BJk0UzwpyNVdFOWLFK--