From nobody Fri Jan 20 09:16:41 2023 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Nyv5B1b9vz2t1Dt for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 09:16:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Nyv593RGXz4Y0f for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 09:16:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=netfence.it header.s=202301 header.b=CQUzOGIf; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 78.134.96.152 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=netfence.it Received: from [10.1.2.18] (mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPSA id 30K9Gf2E000335 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 10:16:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfence.it; s=202301; t=1674206203; bh=YgwBJNDRB7UXOMpjUgotgchIO1F0B4l0cUgTxt1nKuA=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=CQUzOGIfxnMsul093dTt0jE2xHap8+59K0opGQ60dYp+7ua6TxbKAhhgTFVzmPr8q OmEa/ZsDb2GBp4u8TWjvv/o/LZ/+Qfkim2YmNoeQbAoG0Avb1jxVmuohpet+RPb4iy s4zalibpSnfR8bVNXC9tRYphM1qkr8mHvAw6KBu0= X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152] claimed to be [10.1.2.18] Message-ID: <604b55c9-b082-e006-cde6-652df9985b78@netfence.it> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 10:16:41 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.0 Subject: Re: Can security/ca_root_nss be retired? Content-Language: en-US To: ports@freebsd.org References: <551458a3-665f-9f55-8ef9-1dd23e1e3aee@bluerosetech.com> <56babb59-ab5b-7845-fbcb-f1cadddfd425@grosbein.net> <5f9b073d-ff90-3c4d-805c-7034cd2299c6@netfence.it> From: Andrea Venturoli In-Reply-To: <5f9b073d-ff90-3c4d-805c-7034cd2299c6@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netfence.it,none]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.134.96.152]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[netfence.it:s=202301]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ASN(0.00)[asn:35612, ipnet:78.134.0.0/17, country:IT]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[netfence.it:+]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Nyv593RGXz4Y0f X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 1/20/23 09:16, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Base has single certs in /etc/ssl/certs, where I can add my own private > CAs' ones. > > Port provides a single bundled file in > /usr/local/etc/ssl/cert.pem. And also /usr/local/share/certs/ca-root-nss.crt, which is used in other cases, overriding the others stores. So, in the end, there should be agreement on *one* official source of certs and that would be ideally used by everything. The port could/should populate that, without disrupting local additions. bye av.