Re: Can security/ca_root_nss be retired?
- Reply: Andrea Venturoli : "Re: Can security/ca_root_nss be retired?"
- Reply: Tomoaki AOKI : "Re: Can security/ca_root_nss be retired?"
- Reply: Hajimu UMEMOTO : "Re: Can security/ca_root_nss be retired?"
- In reply to: Eugene Grosbein : "Re: Can security/ca_root_nss be retired?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 08:16:11 UTC
On 1/19/23 18:04, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> Given /usr/share/certs exists for all supported releases, is there any reason to keep the ca_root_nss port? Just my 2c... > Single port may be updates more frequently and easily than base system. I agree on this, but there's another problem. Base has single certs in /etc/ssl/certs, where I can add my own private CAs' ones. Port provides a single bundled file in /usr/local/etc/ssl/cert.pem. This (at least in some cases) overrides completely the ones in /etc/ssl/certs, so my own private CAs will not work anymore In the end, I have to delete /usr/local/etc/ssl/cert.pem every time the port creates it (and currently I have found no way to prevent it from doing this). So a port would be fine, possibly very appreciated, if it woulnd't disrupt base/local. bye av. Then there's www/p5-Mozilla-CA and possibly others...