From nobody Thu Jan 19 22:38:27 2023 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Nycwl3QXnz2st4v for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 22:38:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from www121.sakura.ne.jp (www121.sakura.ne.jp [153.125.133.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Nycwk33v4z4ML4 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 22:38:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp has no SPF policy when checking 153.125.133.21) smtp.mailfrom=junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp; dmarc=none Received: from kalamity.joker.local (123-1-88-210.area1b.commufa.jp [123.1.88.210]) (authenticated bits=0) by www121.sakura.ne.jp (8.16.1/8.16.1/[SAKURA-WEB]/20201212) with ESMTPA id 30JMcRBS084743 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 07:38:27 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 07:38:27 +0900 From: Tomoaki AOKI To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can security/ca_root_nss be retired? Message-Id: <20230120073827.7928fdcebd0f7a914f7ea322@dec.sakura.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <56babb59-ab5b-7845-fbcb-f1cadddfd425@grosbein.net> References: <551458a3-665f-9f55-8ef9-1dd23e1e3aee@bluerosetech.com> <56babb59-ab5b-7845-fbcb-f1cadddfd425@grosbein.net> Organization: Junchoon corps X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.08 / 15.00]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.987]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.94)[-0.937]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.60)[0.605]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7684, ipnet:153.125.128.0/18, country:JP]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sakura.ne.jp]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Nycwk33v4z4ML4 X-Spamd-Bar: + X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 00:04:21 +0700 Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 19.01.2023 18:13, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > > > Given /usr/share/certs exists for all supported releases, is there any reason to keep the ca_root_nss port? > > Single port may be updates more frequently and easily than base system. Exactly. ;-) -- Tomoaki AOKI