Re: Can security/ca_root_nss be retired?
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 22:16:46 UTC
> On 19. Jan 2023, at 23:09, Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp> wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 05:58:12 -0800 > Mel Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com> wrote: > >>> On 2023-01-19 4:08, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: >>> On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 03:13:48 -0800 >>> Mel Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Given /usr/share/certs exists for all supported releases, is there any >>>> reason to keep the ca_root_nss port? >>> >>> If everyone in the world uses LATEST main only, yes. >>> But the assumption is clearly nonsense. >>> >>> Basically, commits to main are settled a while before MFC to stable >>> branches, and MFS to releng branches needs additional settling days. >>> >>> If any certs happened to be non-reliable, this delay can cause, at >>> worst, catastorphic scenario. >>> >>> If updates to certs are always promised to be "MFC after: now" and >>> committed to ALL SUPPORTED BRANCHES AT ONCE, I have no objection. >>> >>> If not, keeping ca_root_nss port and updated ASAP with upstream should >>> be mandatory. >> >> If ca_root_nss delivered the certs in the same format, sure, but that >> monolithic file makes installing private CAs a hassle. >> >> I wonder if the script secteam uses to update the trust store in the src >> tree could be turned into a periodic script that automatically updates >> the trust store? Side-step the release engineering delay entirely by >> turning trust store updates into a user task. > > With the approach, how can we avoid man-in-the-middle attack or > something? > > Ports framework has checksum to avoid it, unless local admins > intentionally disable it. > > Maybe adding a script to > *Check if /usr/local/share/certs/ca-root-nss.crt is updated or not. > *Extract individual certs from ca-root-nss.crt and update trust store. > *Record current timestamp and hash of ca-root-nss.crt for next run. > into ca-root-nss port, which can be run from cron or by hand, is needed? > Whatever we do, let’s make sure we don’t break existing setups - this needs to be well coordinated. Personally, I don’t want to update (and reboot) the OS in order to get a current list of trusted CAs (at least as long as pkgbase isn’t mainstream this is an issue). Michael