From nobody Mon Dec 04 07:10:27 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4SkFDg4Xq1z531HJ for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2023 07:10:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SkFDg42Gqz3PYS; Mon, 4 Dec 2023 07:10:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1701673827; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=G61Ml+/4eOABkT3jF4CtCEuI62Owi4WturVij7VdMY0=; b=Ce7JMf7BhgCFrSgPodE0SzXybCCLcIrNXRV4LPsUVw4wmKMMiNELR0V+NZ2TQ0riROYrXW q7oG+EN1JLhROTi+hNv+N93tv9h1Wj0Yushe81vqr+zN4wR60eICuOSjEN0//Ki7oM7rrC uPSg/jz4bJHQgWrXaOBuqo5Q+1o1z7rlfy3d2FmZAWNzaX3Aqq+W5thAFXyDFdlbzk+id2 FemyETfZYeLk3Fjrw6iyp7iFSWpJysTtKFv9kFMrLClC1vixOOFUE+vF49fe9iACsx4dmR e6EUf4C2s3F29GAFjlj1iK32mAsW7jqEs/y/XBAerCOO8n1HrKoy9i8q3MrwjQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1701673827; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=G61Ml+/4eOABkT3jF4CtCEuI62Owi4WturVij7VdMY0=; b=vDZjr9qhwwVZSVlOiBBX4GzNHFcwGQbhrMUb+iyBX0w58+HWA451lfVgljEQnxINUATF0n ArHw8sLz9oqpRRVX7eYm/Rwq+wD1mM1qDYytTOheVThuR1cLKFf99uhNyLdQVyHh+B5aKA rV4GsxQuOia/yKSCX629gLmBcSMj2Y4lU4SbgmToaGi27JRtONLojy1ACoiHLZC1zR9v9u DaUBW+sFf7EwhcJFJ8CbyV60atIOfHUUC9kL4QXc1Lq+mxvA2wOEle4n4oSFh90C80syHi o7r3nw405x6cWeGw2K37Qm2IZI3zPTbB+GzThux4kI7x2B1FbFNqnkV+h7ixQQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1701673827; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=TAOvq1B3wBW4tgRslG3O2u5MUa1NVyaHd68Pgmqom3UPx3gDZzAGOnK+7I5uUQFNGXJ190 z/DJyQRJvELH/dAVX7i6QFR20ZsakVvSeySg/HUJryJD3tT7zcCUv9pFoXIdwE4mxiYUac zSWWghCO/QRzW4plMl4PGQzt2RamfWIpqNmkcg0u3h8hswwY7P0c0vBaCwqJocrjWXpU61 RyJNpaPrLj2md/hTxBPV184FL67mWKRrRk0d29aZBkWBnjHugpYLdCaNSqdjPKVpKfb3sE 0+3iyP63HdXygXs9wTnNR9T9gUM8larKu8LA9WqeS7FSSbX52Zo+5sNFVknc5g== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 6F3C09945; Mon, 4 Dec 2023 07:10:27 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 07:10:27 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Mark Millard Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: aarch64: sysutils/cpu-x@ncurses got SIGSEGV during its initial print_activecore Message-ID: References: <2A081516-C014-48B4-968B-84C198B7D2B2@yahoo.com> <5D09C706-6A51-472A-A35C-E50007AA2F53@yahoo.com> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5D09C706-6A51-472A-A35C-E50007AA2F53@yahoo.com> On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 11:26:04PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > Hmm. On thinking about it, the output: > > # cpu-x > CPU-X:core.c:301: failed to call libcpuid (CPUID instruction is not supported) > CPU-X:core.c:1478: failed to find chipset vendor and model > CPU-X:core.c:1480: failed to find graphic card vendor and model > CPU-X:core.c:2260: failed to retrieve CPU temperature (fallback mode) > > that also occured may be more of an indication that aarch64 is not > actually supported by the infrastructure used. Indeed it is not. Perhaps it's time to teach libcpuid about aarch64? :) > The Makefile should possibly block doing aarch64 builds that will > not work. Likely more than aarch64 would have that status. Previously libcpuid was arch-restricted but I've lifted it a year ago (see commit ff7949343c4a). I guess I could leave it as "i386 amd64" again, but then people would come by and reapply commit 9482644374c1. ./danfe