Re: plist-check not reporting orphaned files present in a @comment
- Reply: Tatsuki Makino : "Re: plist-check not reporting orphaned files present in a @comment"
- Reply: Tatsuki Makino : "Re: plist-check not reporting orphaned files present in a @comment"
- In reply to: Tatsuki Makino : "Re: plist-check not reporting orphaned files present in a @comment"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 18:00:00 UTC
* Tatsuki Makino <tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com> [20230817 17:14]: > Felix Palmen wrote on 2023/08/17 15:03: > > It is, when some file doesn't exist for all architectures, but for more > > than one of them. > > > > You first test the port on ARCH=foo. Then you test on ARCH=bar and find > > that it builds/installs an additional tmp/something, so you prefix it > > with %%BAR%% which expands to "@comment " unless building on ARCH=bar. > > > > Then you test on ARCH=baz which happens to build/install the same > > tmp/something. plist-check will still be happy because the file is there > > in pkg-plist (ignoring the @comment). Still, the file will be missing > > from the package. > > > > I might try another workaround, e.g. expand to "@comment dummy/" > > instead, so the name won't match and plist-check will complain ... > > epson-inkjet-printer-escpr2 is easy because it is restricted to 2 architectures, but in general it seems difficult. > How about also making a combined PLIST_SUB in Makefile? JFTR, this wasn't my problem here. In my concrete scenario, there are only 3 supported archs anyways (I'm building a Linux-native toolchain from source for the Linuxulator, will present it on this list once it works on all 3 archs), and I already define NO_* subs, so it's straight forward to set anything that might be required in pkg-plist. The issue really was just about plist-check, which will *not* report "orphaned" files when they are present in some @comment... I now got around the issue using *this* block in my ports: #v+ .include <bsd.port.options.mk> .if ${ARCH} == amd64 PLIST_SUB+= AMD64="" NO_AMD64="@comment _nonexisting/" .else PLIST_SUB+= AMD64="@comment _nonexisting/" NO_AMD64="" .endif .if ${ARCH} == aarch64 PLIST_SUB+= AARCH64="" NO_AARCH64="@comment _nonexisting/" .else PLIST_SUB+= AARCH64="@comment _nonexisting/" NO_AARCH64="" .endif .if ${ARCH} == i386 PLIST_SUB+= I386="" NO_I386="@comment _nonexisting/" .else PLIST_SUB+= I386="@comment _nonexisting/" NO_I386="" .endif #v- Sure, it's somewhat dirty workaround, but adding some "dummy" prefix to the files makes sure plist-check will complain about them ;) -- Felix Palmen <zirias@FreeBSD.org> {private} felix@palmen-it.de -- ports committer -- {web} http://palmen-it.de {pgp public key} http://palmen-it.de/pub.txt {pgp fingerprint} 6936 13D5 5BBF 4837 B212 3ACC 54AD E006 9879 F231