Re: security/py-fail2ban quits working after some hours
- Reply: Cy Schubert : "Re: security/py-fail2ban quits working after some hours"
- Reply: Cy Schubert : "Re: security/py-fail2ban quits working after some hours"
- In reply to: Cy Schubert : "Re: security/py-fail2ban quits working after some hours"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 00:20:11 UTC
Cy Schubert wrote: > Michael Grimm writes: >> this is a recent stable/13-n252672-2bd3dbe3dd6 running = >> py39-fail2ban-1.0.1_2 and python39-3.9.14 >> I have been running fail2ban for years now, but immediately after = >> upgrading py39-fail2ban fron 0.11.2 to 1.0.1 the fail2ban-server will = >> end up as a runaway process consuming all CPU time. This happens between = >> 4 to 24 hours after initial fail2ban-server startup. Am running fail2ban-1.0.1_2 and python38-3.8.14 did have a similar startup issue. Could not use the 'service' command and had to restort to 'kill -9' to stop. Fix for that was to delete /var/{run,db}/fail2ban/* and restart. Still seeing relatively high CPU utilization compared to the previous version though it rotates cores quickly. PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 67125 root 17 20 0 74M 12M uwait 8 23.7H 102.94% python3.8 Voluntary Context SWitches seem high compared to other processes though have no previous benchmark to compare. PID USERNAME VCSW IVCSW READ WRITE FAULT TOTAL PERCENT COMMAND 67125 root 5907 23 0 0 0 0 0.00% python3.8 Only reading from 5 logfiles; kernel is 12.3-RELEASE-p7; fail2ban built from ports; truss reporting mostly "ERR#60 'Operation timed out'"... Roger Marquis