Re: Intentionally bad port behaviour
- Reply: Jamie Landeg-Jones : "Re: Intentionally bad port behaviour"
- In reply to: Jamie Landeg-Jones : "Intentionally bad port behaviour"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 06:52:36 UTC
Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: > What's the policy on dodgy acting ports? > > I had elinks crash (well, the spidermonkey part crashed) > > elinks then accused me of editting the config file manually (I hadn't) > and then went into an intentional endless loop. > > I think this should be patched out: I think there are (at least) two issues in the port: 1) that code should not be compiled in, because it's in the "else" branch of a "#ifdef HAVE_EXECINFO_H", so something is broken in the port/configure script 2) the port has a "CONIGURE_ENV" line, that is quite surely a typo -- Alex Dupre