Re: [HEADSUP] Deprecation of the ftp support in pkg
- Reply: Baptiste Daroussin : "Re: [HEADSUP] Deprecation of the ftp support in pkg"
- Reply: Dave Hayes : "Re: [HEADSUP] Deprecation of the ftp support in pkg"
- In reply to: Daniel Engberg : "Re: [HEADSUP] Deprecation of the ftp support in pkg"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 17:29:45 UTC
On 2022-01-24 03:00, Daniel Engberg wrote: > Hi, > > I just wanted to chime in on Alexander's (netchild@) mail and I fully agree. > Looking at base we already have a lot of contrib and since we need to adapt > each > software project to our build framework a lot tends to get dated quickly and > currently is so I don't see the benefit importing more at all. I would also > like > to highly advice against importing software which is considered dead > upstream, > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thttpd . > > If anything, something like https://github.com/emikulic/darkhttpd or similar > which > would be very easy to maintain and is active FWIW I'd also like to vote +1 on NO additions. I only vote in favor of ftp in this thread because we have a million year... OK 30 plus years of track record for it and it just works. Tho I must admit I find @bapt's recent tcp proposal an interesting and appealing idea. :-) > > Best regards, > Daniel -- Chris