Re: Adding support for py-package w/ setup.cfg but w/o setup.py
- In reply to: Yoshihiro Ota : "Adding support for py-package w/ setup.cfg but w/o setup.py"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 02:32:23 UTC
On 5/01/2022 11:46 am, Yoshihiro Ota wrote: > Hi, > > I recently create a new PyPI tool for FreeBSD. > Based on PyPI's instruction, I have setup.cfg only without setup.py. > https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/tutorials/packaging-projects/ suggests go with setup.cfg only for simplicity. > > I'm now trying to make a port for it. > However, FreeBSD ports expects a setup.py file. > > It looks if we can run "from setuptools import setup; setup()" in Mk/Uses/python.mk if PYSETUP file doesn't exit. > > I'm wondering if some FreeBSD python port expert can consider no PYSETUP file configuration. > > Hiro > We're going to need to start supporting the newer style build system in the medium-long term as more packages migrate away from setup.py's The Python Team welcomes people who are interested in working on proofs of concept for these mechanisms with a view to including them in python.mk Please reach out on #freebsd-python on Libera Chat IRC and we can get those discussions and PoC's happening ./koobs