Re: New Port: Security/liblurch & Security/Pidgin-lurch
- In reply to: Felix Palmen : "Re: New Port: Security/liblurch & Security/Pidgin-lurch"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 02:10:38 UTC
Good Morning Folks, I now have lurch built over Poudriere; please see https://paste.mozilla.org/EcEH1jPw. I enabled portlint and developer_mode. How do I push this to freshports? Is there anything else to do? On Sat, 27 Aug 2022 at 21:33, Felix Palmen <zirias@freebsd.org> wrote: > * Michael A. Oshin <micadeyeye@gmail.com> [20220827 20:32]: > > Maybe, pidgin-lurch & liblurch go to net-im > > while libomemo etc remain in the security category. > > They make sense in both categories. Maybe you could argue net-im is the > better choice for the primary category because even in context security, > you can't use this software for anything other than messaging. > > Just two more quick notes on this: > > 1. The upstream project name is lurch, not liblurch. Avoid to name the > port differently, it might be confusing for users (and forces you to > override variables like DISTNAME, WRKSRC, etc which would be unnecessary > otherwise). Already renamed in my patches btw. > > 2. I didn't look at pidgin-lurch at all. > > Cheers, Felix > > -- > Felix Palmen <zirias@FreeBSD.org> {private} felix@palmen-it.de > -- ports committer (mentee) -- {web} http://palmen-it.de > {pgp public key} http://palmen-it.de/pub.txt > {pgp fingerprint} 6936 13D5 5BBF 4837 B212 3ACC 54AD E006 9879 F231 >