Re: Why no flavor_USES helper?
- Reply: Mel Pilgrim : "Re: Why no flavor_USES helper?"
- In reply to: Mel Pilgrim : "Re: Why no flavor_USES helper?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 13:40:47 UTC
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 06:33:29AM -0700, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > On 2021-09-06 1:16, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 10:39:29AM -0700, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > > > The flavors helpers like flavor_RUN_DEPENDS are super useful, but I need to > > > modify USES based on flavor, and find that there is no helper for it. > > > > Besause USES are loader 100 lines earlier, meaning only USES are already > > processed when we expand the helper. > > > > Without getting to far in the technical details, USES and FLAVORS are basically > > expanded at the moment, in pre and post section, meaning one had to decide > > either we should allow USES to define flavors, or we should allow USES helpers. > > Is this why there odd race conditions between USES and FLAVORS where, for > example, if I have a FLAVOR that does USES+=pgsql and WANT_PGSQL, the > corresponding postgresqlN-* ports aren't added to *_DEPENDS? I don't know, neither heard of that specific case, but it could be, if so, that sound like a bug in pgsql.mk, I am interesting in an example that show this behaviour. Best regards, Bapt