Re: Regarding port(s) you maintain in FreeBSD ports collection
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2021 22:40:29 UTC
On Sunday, 7 November 2021 at 20:27:01 +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> On 7. Nov 2021, at 20:06, Dan Mahoney (Ports) <freebsd@gushi.org> wrote: >>> On Nov 7, 2021, at 7:04 AM, Daniel Engberg <diizzy@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >>> You're receiving this mail because you have one or more ports that >>> are affected by the change proposed in >>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D32880 ... >> >> This caused me some headscratching (wait, is my port here but not >> in the list? Am I mailed because a port here is a dependency of my >> port?) > >> I???ve concluded that instead I???m receiving this mail because you >> sent it to the entire ports mailing list. Am I wrong? > > At least one of the affected ports is maintained by ports@ (=unmaintained). That makes it rather pointless to say "because you have one or more ports". Now *everybody* has to go through the list to find whether they're affected or not. It would have been better to exclude ports@ from the list. But what I see is that really only ports@ was on the To: list. Greg -- Sent from my desktop computer. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft mail program reports problems, please read http://lemis.com/broken-MUA.php