Re: gnutls requires unbound?
- Reply: jaap.akkerhuis_a_xs4all.nl: "Re: gnutls requires unbound?"
- In reply to: Herbert J. Skuhra: "Re: gnutls requires unbound?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 05:01:44 UTC
On 14/07/2021 3:53 am, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 16:00:29 +0200, "@lbutlr" wrote: >> >> When updating gnutls, the port requires and installs unbound. This >> is despitee the fact that bind is already installed why is a second >> DNS server required for gnutls? Unbound is not running on the system >> (nor could it be, since the DNS ports are bound to bind). > > Yes libunbound.so is required, if you enable option DANE (off by > default). > > DANE_DESC= Certificate verification via DNSSEC > DANE_LIB_DEPENDS= libunbound.so:dns/unbound > DANE_CONFIGURE_ENABLE= libdane > > -- > Herbert > Can libunbound be shipped/packaged separately? Similar to libx264/x264 etc ? If so + 1