From nobody Sat Oct 12 04:20:12 2024 X-Original-To: ports-bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XQVdp3hvjz5YkT9 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:20:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XQVdn46jBz461G for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1728706813; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=x/KBuwSEIpI/aB00xNH0LbB9c6qH505rjyR9ZHJuWE0=; b=A5eaaMOHmfvjZHvHRcT3f8FY5H6LuCclXSe3OIG7F7EEWKJGLFYTDYNr1EKd9eR87mBNj5 KmIo6qqGSgFCTsGiLiaM0Ixp0htds5m03Q+fpz/uRAutsIZgsDW9L4dv4uYOeFrSeG3wda xJh61YHjyo5UzK51rNvbz1BsPKp5PLLEAVxTyOZ58kifG9eRYdUDFTAV+W0L3+QukbjcZo st+EN0MiNgV8ar5FpF3HIC1VpWEybP2AVCnBy81E9D74rqp58gGPPQXZWIsDWQ0/fhl6Mt ETbg2Mb6aLxwXjlrEu0X7LMAB/PP7PdKI5OphNM3x9vw5oLazPKuwJlEJ0Tfbw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1728706813; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=YeW5QG9N8lPg97BIFOJxI2rq+GHkb1OYENn18a2ELJE9LbG4t/e9N+vj9DPnKI9LaaoRzw CFGoj8jouL8Ld/QEEiRje+nKx2i6k69sQJXL0UskOC1DGDE0ivrKEKUSXVRQERJCEHYhp+ t6FhzVP6YBHIP8+VUJ30zTi+YretIYD8EKbZRV+GnuMGGChN1mCss/5Fi5BMoxRf4flJzA +5ZW4GbwU2LxefVD1BUqEsQiSKIyDMW9P6IC0AMOnL40mQHSw4JViieJM0tw1njXqFGCm3 5uGQTF7oa1W33MVk3yRdPCGTb8C4KrmoCR+UJKTCdvhycjLtnB9WwrmZdoIg3A== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XQVdn3kdHz19pK for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 49C4KD9p046335 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:20:13 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 49C4KDuF046334 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:20:13 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 282021] sysutils/s6: some notification-fd values are mistakenly invalid on FreeBSD (regression) Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:20:12 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: sg@redu.cx X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc flagtypes.name Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D282021 Bug ID: 282021 Summary: sysutils/s6: some notification-fd values are mistakenly invalid on FreeBSD (regression) Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: sg@redu.cx CC: crest@rlwinm.de Flags: maintainer-feedback?(crest@rlwinm.de) CC: crest@rlwinm.de Hello, #279116 bumped sysutils/s6 from 2.11.3.2 to 2.12.0.4. Unfortunately, this pulled in a new upstream bug that manifests on FreeBSD but not on (most?) o= ther contemporary Unices -- and so it slipped through the cracks. Briefly, some notification-fd values that were valid in s6 2.11.3.2 became invalid in 2.12.0.4 by mistake. Users with an impacted configuration would observe a complete failure of their supervision trees. More details can be found in the upstream bug report. https://skarnet.org/lists/supervision/3171.html ---- # cat log/notification-fd=20 6 # cat log/run #!/bin/sh exec s6-log -d 6 n2 s16384 t ./data ---- The configuration above reproduces the problem on s6 2.12.0.4 for me. This problem was addressed in the latest respective releases of s6 and skal= ibs. Upstream cut releases earlier this week. If you would prefer to backport a minimal patch, I think this should do it: https://git.skarnet.org/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/skalibs/commit/?id=3Da7973043c92dc= 0f9d083e600142a47ce6dd1c9f6 (This is technically a bug in devel/skalibs, though I figured any interested users would search for sysutils/s6 in bugzilla.) Many thanks. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=