[Bug 278045] [NEW PORT] Simple command-line CalDav client
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 278045] [NEW PORT] deskutils/calendar_cli: Simple command-line CalDav client"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 278045] [NEW PORT] deskutils/calendar_cli: Simple command-line CalDav client"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 06:17:11 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278045 Bug ID: 278045 Summary: [NEW PORT] Simple command-line CalDav client Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: freebsd.org@fydagy.netizen.se Created attachment 249573 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=249573&action=edit New port: Simple command-line CalDav client This is my first attempt at submitting a port to FreeBSD, so please correct me as appropriate. I did post a link to this commit on #freebsd-python a week or two ago, which hopefully ironed out the worst mistakes. To the best of my knowledge, this calendar-cli is the most usable command line tool around for querying CalDAV servers. At least it is the only one I've found which is useful to me. I've been relying on it daily for a few years and contributed a few minor patches. I think it deserves to be easily discoverable for everyone and installable without needing to dance around with venv and pip. According to https://wiki.freebsd.org/Python/PortsPolicy#PKGNAMEPREFIX > Ports MUST use PKGNAMEPREFIX, unless there is a compelling case not to. This tool being an end-user application is hopefully a compelling reason to skip the prefix. A typical user couldn't care less what its implementation language is, or which version of python that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.