[Bug 278045] [NEW PORT] Simple command-line CalDav client

From: <bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 06:17:11 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278045

            Bug ID: 278045
           Summary: [NEW PORT] Simple command-line CalDav client
           Product: Ports & Packages
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Only Me
          Priority: ---
         Component: Individual Port(s)
          Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: freebsd.org@fydagy.netizen.se

Created attachment 249573
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=249573&action=edit
New port: Simple command-line CalDav client

This is my first attempt at submitting a port to FreeBSD, so please correct me
as appropriate. I did post a link to this commit on #freebsd-python a week or
two ago, which hopefully ironed out the worst mistakes.

To the best of my knowledge, this calendar-cli is the most usable command line
tool around for querying CalDAV servers. At least it is the only one I've found
which is useful to me. I've been relying on it daily for a few years and
contributed a few minor patches. I think it deserves to be easily discoverable
for everyone and installable without needing to dance around with venv and pip.

According to https://wiki.freebsd.org/Python/PortsPolicy#PKGNAMEPREFIX

> Ports MUST use PKGNAMEPREFIX, unless there is a compelling case not to.

This tool being an end-user application is hopefully a compelling reason to
skip the prefix. A typical user couldn't care less what its implementation
language is, or which version of python that.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.