[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 11:56:18 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280532 Bug ID: 280532 Summary: www/forgejo: LTS Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: marko.cupac@mimar.rs CC: stb@lassitu.de CC: stb@lassitu.de Flags: maintainer-feedback?(stb@lassitu.de) Hi, according to: https://forgejo.org/2024-07-release-v8-0/#release-schedule-and-long-term-support ... 7.X is LTS, supported until July of 2025, while newly released 8.0 (which is now also version in ports) will be supported for three months only, the same as the next one, 9.X. I think it would be useful to have LTS forgejo in ports. What would be the best way to implement it? Separate port www/forgejo-lts? Or flavor like forgejo@default and forgejo@lts? Something else? Any reasons against it? Regards, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.