[Bug 278129] [NEW PORT] dns/nsd-devel: desired..?
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 278129] [NEW PORT] dns/nsd-devel: desired..?"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 278129] [NEW PORT] dns/nsd-devel: desired..?"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 278129] [NEW PORT] dns/nsd-devel: desired..?"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 278129] [NEW PORT] dns/nsd-devel: desired..?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 13:02:08 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278129 Bug ID: 278129 Summary: [NEW PORT] dns/nsd-devel: desired..? Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: freebsd@dns.company Created attachment 249658 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=249658&action=edit nsd-devel 4.9.0 I made a port to install the not-yet-released NSD 4.9.0 But after many trial and error and edits, it turned out to be almost identical to the current dns/nsd port. After getting poudriere, portlint and portclippy all satisfied this SHAR (attached) is what I ended up with. I'm not sure how much demand / how usefull having a dns/nsd-devel port is / for how long it's desired. But I do think the current maintainer would be the appropiate portmaintainer. Although, I could imagine Jaap doesn't want to maintain two ports. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.