From nobody Sun Oct 08 10:12:41 2023 X-Original-To: ports-bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4S3HzF59F4z4w7qB for ; Sun, 8 Oct 2023 10:12:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4S3HzF2zcGz3VPb for ; Sun, 8 Oct 2023 10:12:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1696759961; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Tipbn9X9gQ7wI63G7e74Q4vdKhIv4NLIh0Zq7X+tjko9zKmUMtvI4jxf5dz5E5ZThpwHlT /6WkQotknUD36cRV6VA+zL6b1dEKIK4WZSpt1u0Y7jThPWIy79A1uYceqMOe0TKZDsStyS 3hR2Z3MJ+SiGgIB367HJQCRcAwETJQ3JDVGwb0jm5RI+vUwGH+G8eLsMGyhcy7Op056BeD sT3+XnlmGEBbnzAeKl2A8jZBASnCyhx/gN3bzGHkDhcN1H4opVMGLCTHWVQgMlvOOH8ybC h+YRhurNEnWMMHOCUNqBrzBcH5cwflt+/O2kH9R1X1CGDDBv5RwzYqEz5DANbQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1696759961; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=eXwLk5fsvknK7MIWSvZaXLSdgJ0OOIIba8vK3gbVUzY=; b=GPPI/YB91hYmfRFSRA0ckYnPwHA02Yc4oUTidKyDx3yl/od8MElAHRo/9qBiJnTgy8YhuV SUthyVwmAxwGbnLQph2XeXYsuqjBvbTWdZiDfwmfAcezmfZwFVj2sXxNcqTwZLd8BaMK3+ D27Mu1bf7or7MKhvwkxvzNSqRCdq8kDKfxNLpDnGtVQsqKgVWHriEbTyNOe8zEJh6sbsuR zRM0ovqfXPgy3cBJg8gpnCi4PXTybvCgM0zur/NFFLtLbuTSPFxu4X/rupkXVBB0pkc4ZU EkP9675RJhUnsw4bguDvsBhGd0hPexMHlsDxvsRHnsUm3kYIoeUSlDB3Tvcknw== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4S3HzF23GWz18Lb for ; Sun, 8 Oct 2023 10:12:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 398ACfof090483 for ; Sun, 8 Oct 2023 10:12:41 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 398ACfOL090482 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 8 Oct 2023 10:12:41 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 268652] Qt5: Some apps fails to start after upgrading to 5.15.8 Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2023 10:12:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D268652 --- Comment #73 from Tomoaki AOKI --- (In reply to Tatsuki Makino from comment #71) Of course. :-) But in (hopefully) some rare cases, delete-from-ports softwares are mandato= ry. For those cases, Old libraries which are mandatory (new one does not work f= or them) and forced to be kept in /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg. We can lock installed ports, but it is not desirable not to update common libraries for some old locked ports. It would be nice if there is any efficient tool to delete only really safe = to delete libraries from /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg. FYI: pkg_replace basically works as oldest port upgrading tool, portupgrade. It keeps old libraries into /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg by default, unlike portmaster. This behaviour helps using applications in half-done state, some of requir= ed libraries are updated but others are not yet, for example, build failures. Default of portmaster would be focus on security. But it assumes that... *All ports are ALWAYS BUILT AND RUN SUCCESSFULLY, unless marked as BROKE= N. *ALL ports works 100% fine with old and updated ports. that is not at all realistic assumption. portupgrade was much more realist= ic. Unfortunately, portupgrade[-devel] is not well maintained for years, so pkg_replace popped in and maintained well by current maintainer. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=