[Bug 269302] [NEW PORT] print/ghostscript10-agpl-base
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 269302] [NEW PORT] print/ghostscript10-agpl-base"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 269302] [NEW PORT] print/ghostscript10-agpl-base"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 269302] [NEW PORT] print/ghostscript10-agpl-base"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 09:08:00 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=269302 Bug ID: 269302 Summary: [NEW PORT] print/ghostscript10-agpl-base Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: michael.osipov@siemens.com Created attachment 239873 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=239873&action=edit Git-formatted patch Tested in QA environment with hundreds of LaTeX and PS files, ran through Poudriere and addressed portlint issues as much as possible. This is based on print/ghostscript9-agpl-base =================== Implicitly or explicitly fixes: * https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251941 * https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264822 * https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=258424 * https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247497 Remove all custom patches for Resource/Init/ since their either cause the bugs above or cover unclear/old marginal/very specific use cases which require explicit documentation/tests to verify them. Ideally, if those are required for CJK they either must be a port option or turned to @sample for the user. See also "git log" of the removed patch files for their previous use cases. =================== -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.