From nobody Tue Apr 25 16:11:22 2023 X-Original-To: ports-bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Q5Rnk34GXz47N53 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 16:11:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Q5Rnk1PWxz3q3N for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 16:11:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1682439082; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MpCMXMZImWAKpnfqVNrivr7kwHLwilOJCRNcR0h1bCg=; b=k/z30rhmgMSunHN1aY7w7qnvTilqfxHhaFUsxZI3YRyjnjatyqGl/W5/Kgo6i88DQKx7SE fFCQAIM8/9h4EmmA1VCeN4g0dGIkm+Zv9UwBjBx9GhRWlEwkSfrMJsl0RsuxEOty5oDFo+ YsHjIPxHKXjOw7eFOhGHcDHwLkz6eMlYjWgOOTfzxEzkSrpyxY3KA01eLx22iyAkHyrz9d 3K/45qRevHOYJGr26qhKAQHhMx0hSoyk3rb0tvylz5L0hMSd+g6t6taWW4Bpeaj+5eLKWc qH17ApXcQGwuM50ezMkpopwPuqFYnCot40h09lztACwSn8ZRBI+hRchgex69rg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1682439082; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=l5R44xU1SgsgVBmBZuPjgBdQghYCijtoicld1O6+K3RVCdKRCgJOOlBWi9LokPB6BxM23i a1QHcKAG8k4hGkpGU2YiRwIWRYPVjrftf4eo+RXkWWnLrll6VUAkTcqOH+NSDbVh5EPm9W BMQkLd6hipGoXJmhzxpYtTn2vxWsn8LCGrE2Jy59D1jg5g3YyFUMCYVwl04tuHsM+KewlD sWrI61Xst4ICsCyeWxpiepOMLnIDVxBwHJF0g07k1/Pr0NNm1S/4gDv+1eAga8bUTON9gD iwITGmOJAJnwzMrNezqEMnmz83jzyx/IuSnRLHAvIj9YcPrOZ9eAK0OmYPedEw== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Q5Rnk0T2Tz1DH2 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 16:11:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 33PGBMEp007228 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 16:11:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 33PGBMHG007227 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 16:11:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 270989] print/ghostscript10: adds libgs.so; connects to USES and DEFAULT_VERSIONS facilities; flavorized Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 16:11:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: michael.osipov@siemens.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? merge-quarterly? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D270989 --- Comment #19 from Michael Osipov --- (In reply to Chad Jacob Milios from comment #17) > i agree in a perfect world X11 should be made an option and FLAVOR should= not be used here; i was only trying to more closely mimic the installation= and behavior of the version 7 8 and 9 ports. And as you pointed out howeve= r, dependant ports cannot presently enforce OPTIONS in their dependencies. = it makes sense some would depend on gs-x11 (which itself depends on gs-base= ), and allow others to simultaneously depend only on gs-base. >=20 > The FLAVORS route (as with the separate-ports route of 7 8 and 9) was set= up so the flavors dont conflict with one another, rather -x11 compliments = -base (thats why i opted to keep those suffixes rather than go with '' vs -= nox11, which to me seemed to imply based on my limited observations made th= ruout the ports tree that to have no suffix vs a -nox11 suffix would mean t= heyre mutually exclusive rather than could get installed together, and that= the no-suffix version would encompass all the functionality of the lesser = and then some) >=20 > As you see, ghostscript9-agpl-x11 only installs the one file X11.so (igno= ring the obligatory LICENSE in /usr/local/share) and i sought to work as si= milarly as is prudent I totally understand your objective here. It, unfortunately, doesn't work f= or 10 :-( > you're probably correct that my decision to put --disable-dynamic in the = base flavor and --enable-dynamic in the x11 flavor would build X11.so as ut= ter trash. that's why you're the maintainer and i'm just a pleb :) i'm not = actually sure the true dependency graph between libgs.so, gsx, gs's X11.so,= and/or any of the ports claiming dependency on ghostscript[789]-x11. i am = unclear the context and greater ramifications of {en,dis}able-dynamic. See my preceding explanation. > i have seen ports that USES ghostscript:x11 simply because they themselve= s utilize x11 yet they're perfectly fine and full featured with libgs.so, w= ithout gs's X11.so. i agree the whole tree could use some cleanup around gh= ostscript and i'd be glad to help with that at your and/or diizzy's directi= on This needs an investigation. I am really now inclined that since X11 is one driver among many, to have it a disabled option by default. We can reconsid= er if someone starts to complain with a good reason for this. > i'm currently running a handful of X11 apps through their paces to figure= out who actually dynamically links what exactly and why What you need to figure out whether they use any of the X11 devices at all,= if not, they don't need X11. This is my understanding. (could be wrong) I will meanwhile rework patch for point 2 to a port option. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=